Caddo Parish · Louisiana

Brain Injury Lawyer In Shreveport, Louisiana

Head injury after your Shreveport wreck? How a Caddo Parish brain injury claim gets proven, from lawyers across from the courthouse. No fee unless we win.

Free case review · No fee unless we win · Open 24/7

Trey Morris
1,756+Shreveport office reviews · 4.94 avg Since 2001Louisiana injury firm 1st JDCWhere Caddo Parish suits are filed $409 MillionRecord verdict $1 Billion+Recovered for clients

Shreveport head injuries come off I-20 and I-49, the Inner Loop, Youree Drive, Bert Kouns, and Mansfield Road, and the worst of them go to Ochsner LSU Health Shreveport on Kings Highway, the Level I trauma center. Willis-Knighton and CHRISTUS Highland run the other emergency rooms across the city. The Shreveport Police Department writes the report on a wreck inside the city limits, and the Caddo Parish Sheriff’s Office writes it for the rest of Caddo Parish. A Caddo suit is filed and tried at the Caddo Parish Courthouse on Texas Street, in the First Judicial District Court, and Trey Morris Injury Lawyers is at 509 Milam Street, across the street from it. In the first week we pull the crash report, order the emergency department chart and the first CT read, and send the preservation letter for the vehicles and any camera on the corridor.

The law that governs the claim is Louisiana law and does not change from parish to parish. If the blow to your head happened on or after July 1, 2024, you have two years to file suit under La. C.C. Art. 3493.1. If it happened before that date, the older one-year period in La. C.C. Art. 3492 governs, and that year goes fast. We build a head injury file out of imaging and neuropsychological testing early, because that is the evidence an adjuster has to answer before it reaches for Art. 2323 and a 51 percent bar.

Real results

Results for Louisiana Clients

All case results →
  • $409 MillionWrongful Death

    A tragic case where an impaired driver of a commercial vehicle ran a red light, then collided with our client, causing serious bodily injury to the mother and the loss of life of her daughter.

  • $49 MillionMotor Vehicle Accident

    An impaired driver of a stolen vehicle driving the wrong way collided with our client head-on, resulting in brain injury and multiple broken bones.

  • $32.2 MillionIndustrial / Workplace

    Failure to maintain proper safety protocols led to an explosion at an industrial plant causing a series of catastrophic injuries from broken bones, burns, spinal injury, and mental anguish.

  • $31.5 MillionIndustrial / Workplace

    Brain and spinal injuries followed an oil-field company failing to maintain equipment and provide a safe work site.

  • $17.2 MillionCommercial Vehicle Accident

    Client was struck head-on by a disconnected load of an 18-wheeler that crossed the median causing broken bones and amputation.

  • $13 MillionCommercial Vehicle Accident

    On the interstate, an 18-wheeler failed to yield right of way then made an unsafe lane change causing the accident which resulted in major bone breaks, damaged organs, and ultimately a leg amputation.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes; each case is decided on its own facts.

What Does a Shreveport Brain Injury Lawyer Do, and When Do You Need One?

The trigger is a mismatch. What you live with every day and what your claim file shows are two different documents. The CT at the emergency room read clean, the discharge sheet said concussion, and now it is three weeks later, the headaches have not quit, you lose the thread in the middle of a phone call, and the people who live with you have noticed you are short with them. Turning that into proof a court and an adjuster credit is the work.

Why a Brain Injury Claim Needs More Than a General Personal Injury Lawyer

These claims run on medical proof and expert testimony that a general practice does not assemble every week. The diagnosis usually rests on neuropsychological testing, advanced imaging, and the treating specialists who read it, not on a broken bone anyone can see on an X-ray. The lawyer has to know which providers around here document a deficit in a way that survives cross-examination, and how to tie one specific deficit to one specific event.

The numbers run longer too. A serious traumatic brain injury can mean a lifetime of care, a career you can no longer hold, and supervision a soft-tissue claim never involves. Pricing that future takes a life care planner, a vocational expert, and an economist, and keeping those three pointed in the same direction is its own skill.

How Brain Injury Cases Differ From Standard Personal Injury Claims

Three things set a brain injury case apart. The injury is often invisible on standard imaging, so causation gets contested in a way a fracture never is. Symptoms can appear or worsen days and weeks later, which gives an insurer room to argue something else caused them. And the damages run decades forward, so the case is built around future care and lost capacity instead of a fixed stack of past bills.

Each difference moves where the case is won. The question stops being whether the collision happened and becomes what the collision did to your brain, and what that costs over a life. You answer that with medical and expert evidence, not with the crash report.

When to Hire a Brain Injury Attorney Rather Than a General PI Lawyer

Get a lawyer who handles head injuries when any of the lasting-injury signs are present: headaches that will not stop, memory or concentration problems, a change in personality or mood, sleep that has come apart, sensitivity to light or noise, or a diagnosed concussion that is not clearing on schedule. Those are the cases where a normal-looking scan runs straight into a lifetime claim, and how the injury is proven decides the outcome.

A general personal injury lawyer is the right fit for a clear-liability wreck with injuries that healed. When the head injury is the center of the case, the medical and expert build is what settles it.

What a Lawyer Investigates in a TBI Case

The investigation starts in the medical record and works outward. We gather the emergency records, the imaging, and every treating provider’s notes, then find the holes that need the right specialist to fill: a neurologist, a neuropsychologist, and where the case calls for it, someone who reads the advanced imaging a routine scan misses. What we are after is a documented line from the event to the deficits you have now.

Liability gets built at the same time. That means securing the accident report, the photographs, the video, the witness accounts, and any physical evidence before it is gone, and sending preservation letters in the first weeks so records are not overwritten. Neither half of the case works without the other.

How a Shreveport Lawyer Builds Your Case

A Shreveport head injury case gets assembled the way it will have to stand up at 501 Texas Street: causation first, then damages, then the fault picture. We coordinate the treating specialists and the retained experts so the medical evidence tells one story instead of five. We document the cognitive, behavioral, and vocational effects through neuropsychological testing and through the people who live and work with you. Then a life care planner and an economist put figures on future medical costs and lost earning capacity, so the demand reflects a lifetime rather than a few months of bills.

From there the file moves toward resolution on that evidence, by negotiation or by trial. Who can be held responsible, how Louisiana measures damages and fault, the deadlines, and the litigation path all come later. An injury that does not announce itself is proven with medical and expert evidence, then priced against the rest of your life.

Do this week: write down the date of the injury and every provider who has seen you since, and bring that list to our office on Milam Street. It takes ten minutes and it is where the file starts.

Why Shreveport hires us

Local Office. Statewide Record.

  • Across the street

    From the 1st JDC

    Our 509 Milam St office sits across the street from the First Judicial District Court, where Shreveport injury suits are filed and tried.

  • 11

    Trial attorneys, one team

    Your case is handled by the firm's own trial attorneys, and we respond in minutes, 24/7.

  • 24/7

    We come to you

    Hospital, home, or the office at 509 Milam St. Free case review, and no fee unless we win.

  • 122

    Cases resolved over $1 million

    Verdicts and settlements of $1 million or more, won by the same trial team that handles Shreveport cases.

What Types of Brain Injuries Do Shreveport Attorneys Handle?

The cases we see here run the full clinical range, from a concussion that clears in a few weeks to a diffuse axonal injury that changes how a person thinks for good. The injury type drives everything after it: the medical proof, the experts who testify, and what the claim is worth. Here are the categories that come up most, and what separates them in how a file gets built.

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Mild, Moderate, and Severe

Traumatic brain injury means damage from an external force to the head, and clinicians grade it mild, moderate, or severe. The grade turns on the Glasgow Coma Scale score, how long consciousness was lost, and how long post-traumatic amnesia lasted. A severe TBI usually involves prolonged unconsciousness and damage you can see on imaging. A mild TBI may involve no loss of consciousness at all and still leave lasting cognitive and emotional deficits.

The word mild misleads people, adjusters included. A mild TBI can end a career and strain a marriage while the hospital discharge summary reads like a routine visit. The distance between the clinical label and what you actually live with is where these claims are won or lost, and it sets the documentation the case demands.

Concussion and Post-Concussion Syndrome

A concussion is a form of mild TBI: a blow or a jolt disrupts how the brain works. Most concussion symptoms clear within days or weeks. When the headaches, dizziness, memory trouble, irritability, and light sensitivity run past that window, the diagnosis becomes post-concussion syndrome.

Post-concussion syndrome is where a lot of Shreveport claims sit, because the symptoms are real and the standard scan is clean. This kind of case rests on consistent treatment records, symptom tracking over time, and testimony from the treating physicians who watched the progression. What kind of care you got matters as much as what the diagnosis was called.

Diffuse Axonal Injury (DAI)

Diffuse axonal injury happens when rapid acceleration and deceleration shear the brain’s nerve fibers, the axons that carry signals between regions. It is common in high-speed collisions, the kind that happen at interstate speed on I-20 and I-49, where the head snaps forward and back. DAI is among the most serious brain injuries because the damage is spread out rather than confined to one spot.

DAI often does not show clearly on an early routine CT, which is why these cases need advanced imaging and neurological expertise. The lasting effects run from cognitive impairment to a persistent vegetative state, and the severity shapes both the medical proof and the life care planning the case will need.

Hypoxic and Anoxic Brain Injuries

Hypoxic and anoxic brain injuries come from oxygen deprivation instead of a blow. Hypoxic means the brain got reduced oxygen; anoxic means it got none. Both follow near-drownings, cardiac events, surgical complications, and anesthesia errors. A near-drowning at Cross Lake and an anesthesia error at a hospital produce the same category of injury.

Brain cells start dying within minutes of losing oxygen, so these injuries can be severe and permanent with no impact to the head at all. The cases turn on a timeline: how long the deprivation ran, when somebody recognized it, and what should have been done. Rebuilding that timeline is how the claim is proven.

Penetrating Head Trauma and Coup-Contrecoup Injuries

Penetrating head trauma is an object breaking through the skull and entering brain tissue, whether from a projectile or from something sharp in a collision, a fall, or an assault. The damage follows the object’s path, and where it went usually predicts the deficits that follow.

A coup-contrecoup injury damages two places: the impact site (coup) and the opposite side of the brain (contrecoup), where the brain strikes the inside of the skull on the rebound. That pattern is common in car and truck wrecks where the head decelerates all at once. Documenting both sites, and tying each one to the mechanics of the crash, is routine work in these files. If you have imaging from the emergency room, ask the hospital records department this week for the images themselves on a disc, not just the radiology report.

What we handle

Shreveport Practice Areas

What Is a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) vs. a Concussion in Louisiana Courts?

A concussion is a traumatic brain injury. In medicine a concussion is classified as a mild TBI, so both terms describe damage to the brain from a blow, a jolt, or a penetrating force. In a courtroom at 501 Texas Street the label is not the issue; the proof is. How the injury shows up in the records, how long the deficits last, and how you tie them to the defendant. When a defense attorney says just a concussion, he is arguing the damage was small and temporary. Often it is the opposite.

Louisiana courts treat a brain injury as a factual question decided on medical evidence, not on the name in the chart. A mild TBI can produce lasting cognitive and behavioral change, and the case succeeds or fails on documentation of that change, not on whether the emergency room wrote concussion or traumatic brain injury.

Pediatric and Second-Impact Syndrome Claims

A brain injury in a child carries medical and legal dimensions an adult claim does not. A child’s brain is still developing, so a head injury can affect learning, behavior, and executive function in ways nobody can measure until years later, when the milestones do not arrive. Proving a pediatric TBI usually takes baseline comparisons, school records, and neuropsychological testing repeated over time.

Second-impact syndrome is rare and often catastrophic: a person, frequently a young athlete, takes a second head injury before an earlier concussion has healed, and the second impact triggers rapid, severe brain swelling. In a claim, the sequence of events and any failure to hold that person out of activity after the first blow become the decisive facts. These cases usually turn on whether a coach, a school, an employer, or a medical provider saw the first injury and acted on it.

Brain Bleeds, Hematomas, and Skull Fractures

Not every brain injury hides from imaging. Subdural, epidural, and subarachnoid hematomas, intracranial bleeds, and skull fractures are structural injuries a CT scan or MRI will show. They are usually graded moderate to severe, and they carry a higher risk of permanent deficit, surgery, and long-term care. A visible bleed takes away the argument the defense reaches for most, that the brain was never actually hurt, because the image is the evidence.

Severity still matters when the injury is visible. A subdural hematoma that resolves on its own is a different case from one that took a craniotomy and months of rehabilitation. The records, operative reports, and follow-up imaging build the timeline from the event to the outcome. When a bleed or a fracture shows on a scan taken soon after the accident, causation gets much easier to establish.

How Injury Type Affects a Shreveport Claim

The subtype drives the two questions that decide value: how strong the causation proof is, and how large the future-care and lost-capacity numbers are. A structural injury with clear imaging is proven one way. A mild TBI with real deficits and normal scans is proven another. Both can support substantial damages, and each needs its own evidence.

Because Louisiana decides these claims on the medical record rather than the diagnostic label, the work looks the same across injury types: secure the imaging, get the neuropsychological testing done, and lock in the treating-provider testimony. Start this week by asking every provider you have seen for a complete copy of your chart, including the raw imaging.

How Do Brain Injuries Happen? Common Causes Litigated in Northwest Louisiana

Most brain injuries litigated in northwest Louisiana come from a short list of causes: highway collisions, falls on unsafe property, industrial and oilfield accidents, medical negligence, and violent or defective-product events. Each cause points at a different responsible party and a different body of evidence. How the injury happened decides who gets sued, which records matter, and how the case is built. Naming the cause early is what saves the proof before it is gone.

Car and Truck Accidents on I-20 and I-49

Vehicle collisions cause more traumatic brain injuries around Shreveport and Bossier City than anything else. The interstate corridors carry heavy commercial traffic, and at those speeds the physics do the damage: the head goes into a windshield, a headrest, or an airbag, or it snaps back and forth hard enough to injure the brain with no direct blow at all. A closed-head injury happens with the skull intact.

A commercial wreck adds layers a car crash does not have. A tractor-trailer collision can involve the driver, the motor carrier, a broker, and a shipper, and it brings in federal safety rules an ordinary driver never faces. The electronic logging data and the event-data-recorder records that reconstruct the crash start overwriting within months, so the first job in a serious truck case is locking those records down before they cycle out.

Slip and Fall / Premises Liability

A fall on someone else’s property produces severe head injuries when the head hits tile, concrete, or a hard edge. Grocery stores, casinos along the Red River, apartment complexes, and parking structures across Caddo and Bossier Parishes generate these claims when a spill goes unmopped, a walkway stays slick, or a stair has no handrail. Older adults are especially vulnerable, and a ground-level fall onto a hard floor is enough to cause bleeding inside the skull.

Premises cases turn on what the owner knew or should have known about the hazard and how long it sat there. Surveillance video, incident reports, and maintenance logs are what prove or disprove that notice, and most of it is overwritten on a short cycle. A preservation demand delivered to the property owner quickly is what keeps the footage from disappearing.

Workplace, Oilfield, and Construction Accidents

The industrial base in this corner of the state means head trauma from falling objects, falls from height, equipment strikes, and blast or pressure events on job sites, oilfield locations, and construction projects. Manufacturing and energy work carry the hazards common to heavy industry, and a struck-by or a fall can leave a lasting cognitive deficit in a worker who walked off the site under his own power.

A workplace brain injury is often more than a workers’ compensation claim. When a third party contributed to the injury, an equipment manufacturer, a subcontractor, or a site owner who is not your direct employer, a separate liability claim can run alongside the comp claim. Working out who controlled the hazard is what determines who can be held accountable.

Medical Malpractice Leading to Brain Damage

Medical negligence causes brain damage too: a delayed diagnosis of a stroke or a bleed, an anesthesia error that starves the brain of oxygen, a surgical mistake, a patient in distress nobody monitored. Oxygen deprivation during childbirth or surgery can cause permanent injury within minutes. These cases are proven through the record and the testimony of physician experts who explain how the standard of care was breached.

Medical malpractice claims in Louisiana run on their own track. They are governed by the Medical Malpractice Act, which adds a review-panel process and a statutory damages structure that ordinary injury claims never see. The details come later on this page. The point here is that a brain injury caused by a provider is litigated under different rules than one caused by a driver or a store.

Assault, Negligent Security, and Product Liability

Assaults cause brain injuries, and when the attack happens on commercial property that failed to provide reasonable security, the owner can share responsibility. Negligent-security claims come out of bars, nightclubs, apartment complexes, and parking lots where a history of prior incidents put the owner on notice that patrons or tenants were at risk. Prior-crime data and the adequacy of the lighting, the cameras, and the staffing are what drive those cases.

Defective products cause brain injuries as well: a helmet that fails on impact, a bad airbag, a ladder that collapses, machinery missing a required guard. A product claim targets the manufacturer and sometimes the distributor, and it requires keeping the product itself exactly as it was after the incident. Whatever the cause, matching the mechanism of injury to the right defendant is the work that turns a head injury into a provable claim. This week, put the helmet, the ladder, the shoes, or whatever else was involved in a box and do not let anyone throw it out or repair it.

What Are the Symptoms of a Brain Injury After an Accident, and What Should You Do?

Brain injury symptoms come in three groups after a crash or a fall: physical (headache, nausea, dizziness, blurred vision), cognitive (confusion, memory gaps, trouble concentrating), and emotional (irritability, anxiety, mood swings). Some show up at the scene. Others arrive hours or days later, once the adrenaline wears off and the swelling sets in. Two things protect your health and your claim at the same time: see a doctor right away, and let the records describe your injuries instead of describing them yourself to an adjuster.

Timing matters because the medical record is the case. A symptom you mention to an emergency room doctor two hours after the wreck carries weight. The same symptom described for the first time three weeks later, after a gap in treatment, hands an insurer the argument that something else caused it.

Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional Symptoms

The physical signs are the ones people notice first: a headache that over-the-counter medicine will not touch, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, sensitivity to light or noise, ringing in the ears, blurred or double vision. Losing consciousness, even for a few seconds, is significant and belongs in the record.

Cognitive symptoms are easier to miss because they feel like ordinary stress. You lose track of a conversation. You cannot remember the drive home from Youree Drive. Words will not come. Everything feels a half-step slow. Family notice this before the injured person does, almost every time.

Emotional and behavioral changes fill out the picture. Irritability that is not like you, anxiety, depression, mood that swings without warning. Sleep goes wrong in one direction or the other, either none of it or far too much. These are neurological symptoms, not a character flaw, and a doctor needs to hear about them.

Delayed Symptoms After a Concussion or TBI

Looking fine at the scene rules out nothing. Concussions and milder traumatic brain injuries produce delayed symptoms all the time. Bleeding or swelling inside the skull builds over hours, and the pressure it creates may cause no trouble at all until that evening or the next morning.

That is how a person walks away from a collision, waves off the ambulance, and then develops a worsening headache, confusion, or vomiting by supper. Anyone who hit their head, or got jolted hard enough to snap the head back, should watch for new or worsening symptoms for at least 24 to 48 hours and get seen the moment one appears. Waiting to see whether it passes is the wrong instinct with a head injury.

Warning Signs That Require Emergency Care

Some symptoms mean call 911 or drive straight to an emergency room, not wait and see: a headache that keeps getting worse, repeated vomiting, seizures or convulsions, one pupil larger than the other, slurred speech, weakness or numbness in an arm or a leg, and clear or bloody fluid draining from the nose or the ears.

Loss of consciousness, an inability to wake someone up, extreme drowsiness, and growing confusion or agitation call for the same response. In a child, watch for constant crying and refusal to eat or nurse along with any of the adult signs. These can mean bleeding or dangerous pressure inside the skull, and minutes count. The Level I trauma center at Ochsner LSU Health Shreveport on Kings Highway is where the worst of these injuries belong; Willis-Knighton and CHRISTUS Highland run emergency rooms across the city as well.

Get Medical Care and Preserve Records

Getting seen quickly does two jobs at once. A doctor goes looking for the bleeding, swelling, and pressure that make a head injury dangerous, and the visit creates a dated record tying your symptoms to the accident. Follow through on the referrals for imaging, neurology, or neuropsychological testing, and keep every appointment. A gap in treatment is one of the most common reasons a brain injury claim gets devalued.

Keep your own paper trail beside the medical one. Save discharge instructions, prescription records, and the name of every provider you see. A few lines each night about symptoms, missed work, and what you could not do that day builds a picture no chart can. Keep any photos of the scene or the vehicle. That is the documentation that turns a description into evidence.

An adjuster will call within days, sometimes within hours, and ask for a recorded statement about the wreck and your injuries. You are not required to give one to the other driver’s insurer. Because head injury symptoms are often delayed and easy to understate early, a statement taken before you know how hurt you are becomes the exhibit used to argue you were fine.

Saying I feel okay the day after a crash, before the headaches and the memory trouble arrive, is exactly the answer that resurfaces in negotiation nine months later. Get medical care first, then get legal advice before you describe your injuries on the record. We handle the calls from the insurer so the account of your injuries comes from your doctors, where it belongs. If an adjuster has already left a message, do not return it this week until you have talked to a lawyer.

Why Are Brain Injury Claims Hard to Prove in Louisiana?

These claims are hard because the injury is invisible on the very tests everyone assumes will confirm it. A concussion or a mild traumatic brain injury can leave real, lasting deficits while the CT and the standard MRI both read normal. The distance between how you actually function and what the imaging shows decides most of these cases, and it is the first place an insurer pushes. The proof problem gets worse from there, because the defense playbook is built to blame a pre-existing condition, a gap in treatment, or ordinary stress for symptoms that came straight out of the trauma.

Brain Injuries May Not Appear on Standard Imaging

A CT scan is built to catch bleeding, swelling, and skull fractures. It is not built to detect the microscopic axonal shearing behind many mild and moderate brain injuries. A standard MRI is more sensitive and still misses the diffuse damage that drives post-concussion symptoms. So a person with genuine memory loss, headaches, light sensitivity, and a changed personality walks out of an emergency room with a clean scan and a discharge note saying nothing is wrong.

That clean scan becomes the centerpiece of the defense. The argument writes itself: no visible injury, no injury. Beating it means moving past the emergency imaging to tests and testimony that measure function instead of structure.

Insurance Companies Dispute Mild TBI and Concussion Claims

Insurers treat mild TBI and concussion claims as the softest target in the injury category, and they contest them hard. The word mild does the work for them. It sounds like a small problem that fixes itself, when a mild TBI can produce deficits that never fully resolve. Adjusters lean on the label, the normal scans, and the absence of a visible wound to argue the claim is exaggerated.

The dispute usually goes after general damages, because pain, cognitive loss, and personality change come with no receipt. A Louisiana plaintiff carries the burden of proving causation and the extent of the damages by a preponderance of the evidence, so a claim resting on your word alone is exposed. Objective support is what moves a concussion claim from disputed to documented.

Pre-Existing Conditions and Alternative Causes

The most common defense theory is that the symptoms came from something other than the accident. A prior concussion, a history of migraines, depression, anxiety, ADHD, a learning difference, plain aging: any of them gets offered as the real cause. If it exists anywhere in your history, the defense will argue the wreck changed nothing.

Louisiana law does not let a defendant off the hook because the person he hurt was already vulnerable. A defendant takes the plaintiff as he finds him, and aggravation of a pre-existing condition is compensable. The work is separating your baseline from your condition after the accident, which takes records showing how you functioned before and expert analysis showing what the trauma added.

Gaps in Treatment and Delayed Diagnosis

A brain injury builds its own barriers to prompt treatment. Impaired judgment, memory problems, and no visible wound add up to a person who does not go in, or downplays what is happening, or never connects a mood change six weeks later to the wreck on Bert Kouns. Symptoms surface days after impact instead of at the scene. The result is a gap between the accident and the diagnosis.

Insurers use that gap as a causation wedge. Every week between injury and treatment becomes an argument that something in between caused the problem, or that a real brain injury would have sent you straight to a doctor. Documenting why the delay happened, and tying the later diagnosis back to the original trauma, is how the objection gets answered. It is not a reason to drop the claim.

Neuropsychological Testing and Expert Testimony

When imaging cannot show the injury, function can. Neuropsychological testing measures memory, attention, processing speed, executive function, and emotional regulation against normed standards, and it produces objective data on deficits no scan will ever capture. Diffusion tensor imaging and other advanced studies can sometimes show white-matter damage a standard MRI misses. Together they replace your say-so with measurable findings.

Expert testimony ties those findings to the accident. A neurologist, a neuropsychologist, or a physiatrist explains the mechanism of injury, connects the test results to the trauma, and answers the pre-existing-condition and alternative-cause theories. We get the neuropsychological testing scheduled early, because a Louisiana brain injury claim depends on turning an invisible injury into a documented one before the insurer’s version of you hardens. If you have not had that testing, ask your treating doctor for the referral at your next visit.

How Do You Prove a Brain Injury Claim in Louisiana?

You prove it by showing, more likely than not, that the defendant’s conduct caused the injury and that the injury produced real damages. That is the preponderance of the evidence standard: the evidence has to tip the scale past fifty percent, not erase all doubt. For a brain injury that means a documented chain running from the incident, to a diagnosis, to objective medical findings, to a professional opinion connecting the two. A missing link anywhere in the chain is where the defense attacks.

The proof comes in three parts that have to line up: medical evidence that a brain injury exists, expert testimony that the incident caused it, and documentation of how the injury changed your daily function. Each part carries its own evidence and its own traps.

Medical Evidence: MRI, CT, DTI, fMRI, EEG, Neuropsychological Testing

The medical record is the foundation. Different tests catch different things, and a strong case usually leans on several instead of one. A CT is fast and good at finding bleeds, skull fractures, and gross structural damage in the emergency room. An MRI shows soft-tissue detail a CT cannot, and it can reveal contusions or shear injury the CT missed.

Past those two, advanced imaging does the heavy lifting in a disputed case. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) maps the brain’s white-matter tracts and can show microscopic axonal damage an ordinary scan will not. Functional MRI (fMRI) measures brain activity and blood flow during tasks. An EEG records electrical activity and can document seizure activity or slowing tied to the injury. Neuropsychological testing comes at it from another angle: a battery of standardized tests measuring memory, processing speed, attention, executive function, and mood against population norms. Imaging shows the structure. Neuropsychological testing shows the function that structure is supposed to support.

Why Standard Imaging Often Misses Mild TBI

A normal CT or MRI does not mean the brain is uninjured. Mild traumatic brain injuries frequently involve damage at the cellular and microstructural level that standard imaging was never designed to detect. Axons get stretched or sheared and the chemistry of the brain gets disrupted while the anatomy still looks intact on a routine scan.

That gap matters because the normal scan becomes the centerpiece of the defense argument. It is why DTI and functional testing, paired with neuropsychological data and a consistent symptom record, carry the weight here. The proof lives in the pattern across several sources, not in one image. Documenting cognitive and behavioral change over time usually does more than one picture of the brain ever will.

Expert Witnesses Required in Louisiana Brain Injury Cases

Because causation is the contested question in most brain injury claims, expert testimony is close to essential. A treating neurologist or neuropsychologist testifies to the diagnosis and the objective findings. A neuroradiologist reads the advanced imaging and explains what a juror cannot see. A life care planner and an economist turn future medical needs and lost earning capacity into figures.

The expert’s job is connecting the science to what you have to prove. A doctor saying an injury exists is not enough; the opinion has to link the incident to the injury and address the competing explanations. A well-supported opinion, grounded in the imaging, the testing, and the medical history, is usually what carries a claim over the more-likely-than-not line. We put that team together early, so the medical narrative is built before the defense builds its own.

Accident Reports, Photos, and Scene Evidence

Medical proof does not stand by itself. Evidence from the incident establishes the mechanism of injury, the force involved, and who was at fault. The police report, crash photographs, damage estimates, and event-data-recorder readings all help show the impact was capable of causing a brain injury. Witness statements and surveillance footage fix what happened in place before memories fade and records cycle out.

This evidence disappears on a schedule. Skid marks on the Inner Loop get washed away, vehicles are repaired or scrapped, camera footage records over itself. Preserving it in the first weeks, through a preservation letter and a prompt investigation, keeps the mechanism-of-injury story intact for the experts who will need it a year later.

Documenting Long-Term Cognitive and Behavioral Deficits

Damages proof runs past the diagnosis into how the injury reshapes an ordinary day. Memory that will not hold. A job you can no longer keep. A temper that arrives out of nowhere. Help needed with tasks you handled alone for thirty years. None of that appears on paper unless somebody writes it down.

We build that record through consistent treatment, therapy notes, and neuropsychological reevaluation over time. Statements from family, coworkers, and teachers describe the before and after in terms a jury understands. A day-in-the-life account and a life care plan put the ongoing cost in front of the court. That is the evidence showing the injury is not a moment in the past but a condition you live with. Start the daily journal this week, one paragraph a night, dated.

How Much Compensation Can a Brain Injury Victim Recover in Shreveport, Louisiana?

A Louisiana brain injury claim covers two broad categories of loss: economic damages, the measurable dollar costs, and non-economic damages, the human losses that come with no receipt. In an ordinary injury case Louisiana puts no general statutory cap on non-economic damages, so the value of a serious traumatic brain injury turns on the medical proof and the projected lifetime cost of care instead of a ceiling somebody wrote into a statute. Two exceptions matter: a brain injury caused by medical negligence falls under a statutory cap, and claims against government entities carry their own limits. The number in your case depends on the severity of the deficits, your age and earnings, and the future care your treating team documents.

Economic Damages: Medical Bills, Lost Wages, Future Care

Economic damages reimburse the concrete costs: emergency treatment, imaging, hospitalization, neurology, and rehabilitation already run up, plus the time off work during treatment. Future medical care is often the largest economic piece of a severe traumatic brain injury, because attendant care, therapy, medication, and repeat evaluations continue for decades.

Documenting those costs takes more than a stack of invoices. Billing records establish the past, but future expenses have to be projected by treating physicians and specialists and then reduced to present value. That projection is where these cases are won or lost, because an insurer will call future treatment speculative unless a physician has written the plan.

Non-Economic Damages: Pain, Suffering, Loss of Consortium

Non-economic damages compensate what never shows up on a bill: physical pain, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life. In a brain injury case they carry the personality and cognitive changes that alter who you are at work and at home. Louisiana imposes no general statutory cap on non-economic damages in ordinary personal injury cases outside the medical malpractice and government-liability contexts, so a jury may award what the evidence supports.

Loss of consortium belongs to close family members. It compensates a spouse, and in some cases a child or a parent, for the loss of companionship, support, and services when a brain injury changes how the injured person takes part in the family. It is a separate claim from the injured person’s own damages, and it is proven with the family’s own testimony about what a Tuesday looks like now compared with before.

Punitive damages are almost never available here. Louisiana does not allow punitive or exemplary damages unless a statute expressly authorizes them. The narrow exception that reaches injury cases applies when the harm was caused by the wanton or reckless disregard of an intoxicated motor vehicle operator whose intoxication was a cause in fact of the injury; there, exemplary damages are available under La. C.C. art. 2315.4 with no cap on the amount. Without a statute like that one, the claim is limited to economic and non-economic damages.

Lost and Future Earning Capacity

Lost earning capacity is a different thing from lost wages. Wages measure what you failed to earn while you were treating. Capacity measures what you can no longer earn going forward, because the injury cut your ability to work at all or pushed you into lower-paying or part-time work.

The calculation matters most for younger clients and for people whose careers ran on the exact functions a brain injury takes: memory, executive planning, concentration, processing speed. Proving it usually takes a vocational expert to assess the reduced capacity and an economist to convert that reduction into a lifetime figure at present value. A person who goes back to work part-time still has a substantial earning-capacity claim if the injury permanently lowered the ceiling.

Wrongful Death and Survival Actions After Fatal TBI

When a brain injury kills, Louisiana recognizes two separate claims. A survival action compensates the injured person’s own damages between the injury and the death, including conscious pain, suffering, and medical expenses during that interval. A wrongful death action belongs to the surviving family and compensates their losses: the deceased’s love, companionship, support, and financial contribution.

They are different claims held by different people, and both can go forward in the same suit. The survival claim looks back at what your husband or your mother went through. The wrongful death claim looks forward at what the family is without. Which relatives may bring each one, and in what order of priority, depends on who survives the decedent.

Life Care Planning and Future Medical Costs

For a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, the future cost of care is usually the single largest element of the claim, and it is proven with a life care plan. A certified life care planner works with the treating physicians to map every anticipated cost across the remaining life expectancy: attendant care, therapies, home modifications, assistive technology, medications, and how often each specialist has to be seen. An economist then converts the plan into a present-value figure a jury can award.

A brain injury caused by medical negligence is the one place these costs work differently. Under the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act, La. R.S. 40:1231.2 caps total damages against a qualified health care provider at $500,000, combining economic and non-economic damages, and that cap is exclusive of future medical care and related benefits. Future medical care in a malpractice case is not paid as a lump sum inside the cap. It is paid as it is incurred, through the Patient Compensation Fund. That changes how a life care plan functions in a malpractice claim, because the fund covers qualifying future treatment on an ongoing basis instead of folding it into the capped award. Gather your last two years of pay stubs or tax returns this week; earning capacity is the number people underdocument most.

Google reviews

What Shreveport Clients Say

1,756 five-star Shreveport office reviews →
  • Emma Dvorak
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 3, 2026

    I was overwhelmed dealing with everything after my injury, but their team took a lot of the pressure off of me.They were patient, answered all my questions, and made sure I understood what was happening.

  • Diane Didier
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 2, 2026

    I was recommended to Trey Morris by a friend, and they have been amazing!They kept me up to date with all the details of my case. I was in the loop during the entire process. Having to go over the details my accident was so uncomfortable, but they were so understanding and made every effort to make the entire process as smooth as possible. I would highly recommend Trey Morris and his team to anyone.

  • Laurie Shearin
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 2, 2026

    I'll always appreciate the way I was treated here.I felt heard, respected and taken care of from beginning to end.

  • Zachary Krengle
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 2, 2026

    Trey Morris and the team treated me so well after my accident.Beyond taking the steps to make sure my case was taken care of timely and apropiatelly. They listened and made me feel like I was a priority to them and not just another client. I hope none of my friends are put in a situation to need them, but if they do I would highly suggest Trey Morris and the team.

  • Valorie Schneider
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 2, 2026

    Really glad I chose Trey Morris Injury Law.They were easy to work with and made sure I understood what was going on.

  • Alayna Cantrell
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 2, 2026

    I would recommend Trey Morris to my friends and family.Trey Morris & the team there helped me with my case. The firm is amazing!

  • Sunshine Halpert
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 2, 2026

    This is the firm you want handling your car accident.Trey Morris Injury Lawyers is the best. Jessica, Seth, and Brian handled my case quickly. They kept me up to date and infor ed the whole time. I will send everyone I know to you guys. Thanks so much!

  • Alyx Braud
    Shreveport Office · Sep. 2, 2026

    My mans Trey Trey got it done!All the people at the firm were super friendly and they really made me feel like they cared about my case as much as I did. It didn't take too long and I got my settlement 🤑

How Does Louisiana’s Comparative Fault Rule Reduce Your Compensation?

Louisiana cuts a damages award by the percentage of fault assigned to you, and for causes of action arising on or after January 1, 2026, a plaintiff found 51 percent or more at fault takes nothing, while a plaintiff at 50 percent or less has the award reduced by the assigned percentage but not wiped out, under La. C.C. art. 2323. Once the medical proof is settled, that one rule decides what the case is worth. Fault gets divided among everyone who contributed to the accident, and your share comes off the top. In a serious brain injury case, where the numbers are large, even a modest percentage moves real money.

Because the reduction tracks the percentage, the argument over blame is often the actual dispute in a brain injury case, not the medicine. An insurer reaches for fault first when the injury is to the brain, and a few percentage points move real money.

Pure Comparative Fault Explained

Comparative fault is the mechanism a Louisiana court uses to split responsibility among the parties who caused an accident. The judge or jury assigns a percentage to you, to each defendant, and sometimes to non-parties who share blame. The percentages have to total 100. Your percentage then reduces the award against the full value of the damages.

The full value comes first. A jury decides what the injury is worth, counting medical bills, lost income, future care, and the human losses a brain injury brings. Only after that number is fixed does the court apply the fault split. The order matters. What the case is worth and who was at fault are two separate arguments, and both have to go your way to protect the award.

How Fault Percentage Affects a Damages Award

Every point of fault assigned to you subtracts a proportional slice of the verdict. Take a jury valuation of $1 million. At 10 percent fault the award drops by $100,000 to $900,000. At 20 percent it drops to $800,000. At 40 percent it drops to $600,000. The math is linear, which is why the defense rarely tries to prove you caused the whole wreck. They try to move your share a few points, because each point is money the insurer keeps.

Near the top of the scale the arithmetic turns all or nothing. That same $1 million valuation pays $500,000 at a 50 percent split. Push the same injured person to 51 percent and the same catastrophic injury pays zero. One point is the difference between a substantial award and nothing, so where the fault line falls is the whole game, not a rounding detail.

How Insurers Use Fault to Devalue TBI Claims

Fault is the first place an insurer looks to cut a brain injury payout, and head injury cases hand carriers openings other cases do not. A person with a head injury may have been disoriented at the scene, may have given the officer a scrambled account, may have symptoms that showed up a week later. Insurers work to convert that confusion into an argument that you were inattentive, that you contributed to the collision, that you ignored an obvious hazard.

The fault split also lets a carrier attack a big damages number without ever conceding the injury is minor. Instead of disputing that the brain injury is real, the insurer argues you were speeding on Mansfield Road, or not wearing a seatbelt, or looking at a phone, and asks the jury to move 30 or 40 percent onto you. On a high-value TBI verdict, that argument is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars to the defense. We treat fault as its own contested issue: preserve the scene evidence in the first weeks, lock down the reconstruction, and answer the inattention story before it hardens into a number a jury will accept. If you have photos of the intersection, the vehicles, or the hazard on your phone, back them up somewhere safe this week.

What Is the Statute of Limitations for a Brain Injury Claim in Louisiana?

You have two years to file if the injury happened on or after July 1, 2024, and one year if it happened before that date, under La. C.C. Art. 3493.1 and La. C.C. Art. 3492. Louisiana calls this deadline a prescriptive period, and it runs from the day the injury was sustained. Miss it and the court dismisses the case no matter how strong the medical evidence is. The date of the accident sets the clock that governs everything else.

That cutoff matters more in head injury cases than in most, because the symptoms can surface days or weeks after the crash. The deadline runs on the injury, not on the symptoms. A concussion that looked minor at the scene does not restart the clock when the headaches, the memory problems, and the mood changes finally send you to a neurologist.

2024 Update: Two-Year Prescriptive Period for Injuries After July 1, 2024

For a brain injury sustained on or after July 1, 2024, you have two years from the date of injury to file suit under La. C.C. Art. 3493.1. That doubled the old window. The two years run from when the injury or damage was sustained, which for most accident-related brain injuries is the date of the collision, the fall, or whatever else happened.

Two years is more room than Louisiana used to give, and it is still not a reason to wait. These cases turn on imaging, neuropsychological testing, and witness accounts, and all three degrade. Vehicle data gets overwritten, surveillance footage gets deleted, and memories go soft. The earlier the claim is worked up, the more of that evidence is still there to use.

One-Year Rule for Injuries Before July 1, 2024

A brain injury that happened before July 1, 2024 runs on the older one-year prescriptive period under La. C.C. Art. 3492. That single year runs from the date the injury was sustained, and it does not bend. The change is not retroactive, so the date of the accident, not the date you are reading this, decides which rule applies to your claim.

Product liability claims follow the same date rule. A brain injury from a defective helmet, airbag, or piece of equipment ran on the one-year period only if it happened before July 1, 2024. On or after that date, the product claim carries the same two years as a claim against the negligent driver in the same wreck.

Discovery and Tolling for Latent TBI Symptoms

Louisiana recognizes situations where a filing deadline can be suspended because a claimant could not reasonably have known of the injury or its cause. The concept matters for head injuries, since cognitive and behavioral deficits sometimes are not connected to an accident until long after it. Where a claimant did not know and had no reasonable way to know, when the clock starts can be affected.

Treat that as a narrow idea rather than a plan. Whether any suspension applies is a fact-intensive question, and we work it at intake by pinning down when the symptoms appeared, when they were diagnosed, and when the link to the accident became apparent. The safer road is always to file inside the standard period instead of leaning on an argument that the clock started late. Raise a possible delayed-discovery issue with a lawyer early, so the facts get measured against the rules rather than assumed.

Minor and Incapacitated Claimants

The timing changes when the injured person is a child or an adult who can no longer manage his own affairs. A severe brain injury can leave someone legally incapacitated, and a young child cannot bring a claim at all. Louisiana handles both through separate rules on suspension and representation, and the deadline that applies to a competent adult may not run the same way against a minor or an interdicted person.

Because those rules interact with who has authority to sue on the person’s behalf, the deadline should never be counted off a calendar alone. We look at guardianship, curatorship, and capacity as part of evaluating any case involving a child or a severely disabled client, and we calendar it conservatively so no filing window is lost while the representation question is being sorted out.

Notice Requirements for Claims Against Government Entities

When the responsible party is a state agency, a parish, a city, or another public entity, the ordinary prescriptive period is only part of the picture. Claims against the state and its political subdivisions carry procedural and liability rules that do not apply to a suit against a private driver or a business. A brain injury from a dangerous public road, a government vehicle, or a public facility can trigger them.

The practical point is that public-entity claims need early legal review, because the procedural steps and the filing deadline both have to be met. Whether a government defendant is in the case is one of the first things we sort out, and where one is, we move quicker and track the extra rules alongside the prescriptive period. Find the date of your accident and write it on the front of the folder this week; every deadline on this page counts from that day.

Who Can Be Held Liable for a Brain Injury in Shreveport?

Liability turns on who owed a duty, who broke it, and whose breach caused the harm. That question rarely has one answer. A serious head injury usually traces to more than one party, and you can pursue every party whose fault contributed. Finding all of them early matters, because each additional defendant usually means another insurance policy and a wider pool the damages can be paid from.

The categories below show up most often in Shreveport-area cases. Which defendants belong in your suit depends on how the injury happened, and part of the investigation is following the facts to everybody who shares the blame.

Negligent Drivers and Commercial Trucking Companies

The driver who caused the wreck is the obvious defendant and frequently not the only one. When a commercial truck is involved, the motor carrier that employed the driver can be liable for its own negligence in hiring, training, or supervising, and separately liable for the driver’s conduct under respondeat superior. A brokered load pulls in the broker. A badly maintained rig pulls in the maintenance contractor.

We look past the person behind the wheel to the corporate structure that put that truck on I-20. Preserving the driver’s logs, the carrier’s records, and the electronic data is the first step in proving the company’s own fault.

Property Owners and Businesses

When a fall or a falling object on someone else’s property causes a head injury, the owner or occupier can be liable under Louisiana premises law. A merchant, a landlord, or a business that controls the premises has a duty to keep the place reasonably safe and to warn about hazards it knew about or should have found. A brain injury from a fall on an unmarked wet floor or a broken stairway is a premises claim.

The defendant is whoever had custody or control of the dangerous condition, and that is not always whose name is on the deed. A tenant business, a management company, or a maintenance vendor may be the party that actually controlled the hazard.

Employers, Contractors, and Third Parties

A brain injury on the job raises a layered liability picture. Workers’ compensation is the usual route against your direct employer, but that system does not always reach the party truly at fault. A third-party contractor, a subcontractor, an equipment supplier, or a separate company working the same site can be sued directly in tort when its negligence caused the injury.

Sorting out the corporate relationships on a worksite is central to these cases. The direct employer, the general contractor, and the independent vendors each carry different duties and different insurance, and a third-party claim often reaches compensation that workers’ compensation alone cannot.

Product Manufacturers

When a defective product causes a brain injury, the manufacturer can be liable under the Louisiana Products Liability Act. A helmet that failed, a defective airbag, faulty industrial machinery, or equipment sold without adequate safety guards or warnings can support a claim against the maker, and sometimes against the distributors and sellers in the chain of commerce.

Product claims require preserving the product itself and usually depend on an engineering analysis of the defect. Identifying every entity in the manufacturing and distribution chain is part of building the case.

Government Agencies and Public Entities

A brain injury caused by a public entity, from a dangerous road condition, a negligently operated government vehicle, or an unsafe public facility, can support a claim against the state or a political subdivision. Under La. R.S. 13:5106, the liability of the state and its political subdivisions is capped in qualifying suits, subject to statutory exceptions.

That limit shapes how the claim is valued and handled from day one. Government claims also run through their own procedural and notice steps, so identifying a public entity early changes the plan for the whole matter. Whether a government defendant is involved is one of the first questions the investigation answers. This week, write down every business, contractor, or agency whose name was anywhere near the scene, even if you are not sure it matters.

What Is the Brain Injury Litigation Process in Shreveport, Step by Step?

A Shreveport brain injury case moves through five stages: an initial evaluation and medical record review, filing and service of the lawsuit, discovery, negotiation or mediation, and trial if it does not resolve. Most claims settle, and the file still gets built as though it will be tried, because a defendant looking at a trial-ready case pays more to stay out of a courtroom. A Caddo Parish wreck is filed in the First Judicial District Court at 501 Texas Street; if your injury happened across the river, the case goes to the 26th Judicial District Court in Benton. Knowing what happens at each stage tells a family where the case actually stands.

Case Evaluation and Medical Record Review

The work starts with what happened and what the records show. A brain injury case lives on the connection between the incident and the neurological deficits, so the first job is gathering the emergency records, the imaging, and the treatment notes and reading them against the facts of the accident. That review tells us whether the diagnosis is documented, whether there are treatment gaps a defense will exploit, and which specialists still need to see you. It also identifies the potential defendants and whether their insurance can cover a serious injury. Nothing gets filed until that groundwork exists, because a brain injury claim built on thin documentation invites the exact attacks that sink these cases.

Filing and Serving the Defendant in District Court

Once the claim is ready, the suit is filed as a petition in the district court that hears civil injury suits arising in Shreveport. The petition names each defendant, states the facts, and identifies the damages sought. After filing, each defendant has to be formally served with the petition and citation so the court has jurisdiction over them, and service starts the clock for the answer. When a public entity is a defendant, the suit follows the additional procedural and liability rules Louisiana applies to the state and its political subdivisions, with their own service and notice steps.

Discovery: Depositions, IME Battles, and Expert Exchange

Discovery is where the case gets built out, and it is the longest stage. Both sides exchange written questions, request documents, and depose the parties, the treating physicians, and the witnesses. The defense will almost always demand an independent medical examination, where a doctor it chose examines you and then disputes the severity or the cause of the injury. That examination gets contested. Your neurologists, neuropsychologists, and life care planners are disclosed as expert witnesses, their reports are exchanged with the defense experts, and everybody gets deposed. This is the stage where the imaging, the testing, and the documentation of long-term deficits move out of the medical file and into the legal record.

Mediation and Settlement Negotiation

Most brain injury claims end in a negotiated number rather than a verdict. Once discovery has established the medical picture and the damages, the parties usually go to mediation, where a neutral third party works both sides toward a figure. Settlement value tracks the evidence built in discovery: a documented injury with credible expert support commands more than a disputed one. A settlement ends the case with a defined payment and takes the risk and delay of trial off the table. You decide whether to accept any offer. If the offer does not match the harm, the case keeps moving toward trial.

Trial in District Court

When a fair settlement does not come, the case is tried in the court where it was filed, which for a Caddo Parish injury is the courthouse across the street from our office. The medical and expert evidence developed in discovery goes to a judge or a jury, which decides liability and the amount of damages. The treating physicians and retained experts testify, the imaging and the testing are put in front of the jury, and the defense presents its competing view of causation and severity. A trial-ready file built from the first case review forward is what gives you leverage at every earlier stage, because a defendant weighs the risk of that verdict when it decides what to offer. If nobody has read your medical records against the facts of the accident yet, get that review on the calendar this week.

Why Hire a Local Shreveport Brain Injury Lawyer Instead of a Houston, Dallas, or National Firm?

A brain injury case filed in Caddo Parish is decided under Louisiana rules and argued in a courthouse where the judges, the opposing counsel, and the treating physicians are already known to the lawyers who work here. Venue and medical relationships are the practical reason out-of-state and national firms keep bringing in Louisiana counsel to do the actual work on a Louisiana file. Hiring the local firm puts those lawyers on the case from the start instead of at the end.

Local Court Knowledge in Caddo, Bossier, and Webster Parishes

Brain injury suits in Shreveport are litigated at the Caddo Parish courthouse, with related matters across the river in Bossier Parish and east of here in Webster Parish. Knowing the venue means knowing the standing orders, how each division schedules, which judge handles an expert-heavy trial in what way, and which local defense firms and adjusters sit across the table. That shapes strategy on scheduling, on when to push toward trial, and on how a jury pool in this part of the state weighs a mild traumatic brain injury whose imaging reads normal. A firm in another state cannot buy that on short notice.

Relationships with Shreveport-Area Medical Experts and Life Care Planners

These claims turn on medical proof and on whether the experts presenting it are believed. A local firm has working relationships with the neurologists, neuropsychologists, radiologists, and life care planners who treat and evaluate patients here. That matters twice over: the treating providers are close enough for you to keep going back, and the retained experts have local courtroom track records that hold up on cross-examination. Running a client’s care and expert workup through providers three states away adds cost, delay, and friction a local case never carries.

Reading the Fee Agreement

If you are weighing a local firm against a distant one, put the fee agreements side by side. The written agreement states the percentage the firm charges and how case costs (investigation, expert workups, litigation expenses) are handled and reimbursed. Those two terms set the net figure you keep. Read each agreement itself rather than a summary of it, and the comparison stops being a guess.

Direct Access to the Lawyers Handling the Case

You are better off working with the lawyers who are actually building the case, in a courthouse those lawyers know. A firm you can drive to and sit down with, whose attorneys appear in the same divisions year after year, gives you that from intake through trial. It matters more in a head injury case than in any other, because memory and concentration deficits make a distant, hard-to-reach firm genuinely harder to work with. Our case results are public, and the attorneys who handle these files out of the Shreveport office, including Trey Morris, are listed with them. Read both before you decide who to call, and if you want to sit down about a head injury, our office is at 509 Milam Street, across the street from the courthouse where your case will be heard.

Down the street, not a call center

Your Shreveport Trial Team

Meet all 11 attorneys →

The lawyers who work your file. Every Shreveport case is handled by the firm's own trial attorneys.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I Sue If My Symptoms Appeared Days After the Accident?
Yes. Delayed onset does not bar a claim. Brain injury symptoms often surface hours or days after the impact, once swelling develops or the initial adrenaline wears off. Headaches, confusion, memory trouble, and mood changes that emerge later are still tied to the accident when the medical evidence connects them. The practical concern is documentation, not eligibility. A gap between the wreck and the first medical visit gives an insurer room to argue the injury came from something else. The way to close that gap is to see a doctor as soon as symptoms appear, describe the accident, and let the record show the timeline. Contemporaneous notes from the treating physician carry more weight than a diagnosis assembled months later.
What If I Was Partially at Fault?
You can still recover, and your award is reduced by your share of fault. Louisiana follows a comparative fault system under La. C.C. art. 2323. Your damages drop by the percentage of fault assigned to you rather than being erased. If a jury finds you 20 percent at fault on a $500,000 award, you recover $400,000. For causes of action arising on or after January 1, 2026, a plaintiff found 51 percent or more at fault recovers nothing; at 50 percent or less, damages are reduced by the assigned percentage. Insurers know this and often push to inflate the injured person's share, because every point of fault they can shift lowers what they pay. Being partly at fault is a reason to document the other party's conduct carefully, not a reason to assume you have no claim.
Can I Sue If My CT Scan Was Normal?
Yes. A normal CT scan does not rule out a brain injury. CT imaging is built to detect bleeding, skull fractures, and gross structural damage. It routinely misses the microscopic axonal damage that produces mild traumatic brain injury and post-concussion syndrome. Many people with real, lasting deficits have clean CT results. Proving injury after normal standard imaging usually relies on other evidence: advanced imaging, neuropsychological testing that measures cognitive function, and consistent records from treating providers who document the deficits over time. A normal scan is one data point. It is not the last word on whether the brain was hurt.
What If the At-Fault Driver Had No Insurance?
An uninsured at-fault driver does not automatically leave you without a source of compensation. Your own uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage exists for exactly this situation, and it can pay for injuries the at-fault driver cannot cover. Louisiana drivers who did not reject that coverage in writing generally carry it. Other sources may also apply, depending on the facts. A commercial employer, a vehicle owner separate from the driver, or another party whose conduct contributed to the crash can each be a route to compensation. Identifying every potentially responsible party and every applicable policy is part of building the claim.
Can a Family Member File for a Severely Injured TBI Victim?
Yes. When a brain injury leaves a person unable to manage their own affairs, a family member or other authorized representative can pursue the claim on their behalf. This usually involves a court appointing someone to act for the incapacitated person, who then has authority to file suit, make decisions, and accept a settlement subject to court oversight. The filing deadline still runs, so acting promptly matters even when the injured person cannot participate. For injuries on or after July 1, 2024, Louisiana applies a two-year prescriptive period, and the clock does not wait for the family to sort out representation. Getting the appointment underway early keeps the claim from being lost to a missed deadline.

Last updated September 9, 2026