If you got hurt on a boat, a barge, or a rig, the first question is not how bad the injury is. It is which body of law measures it. Federal maritime law reaches your claim only when the facts put you on a vessel or on navigable water, and seaman status turns on your connection to that vessel, not on the job title printed on your paycheck. Our office at 509 Milam Street, across the street from the Caddo Parish Courthouse, starts a Shreveport file with that vessel connection, because once an adjuster applies an ordinary workers’ compensation deadline to a seaman, the wrong clock is already running.
Results for Louisiana Clients
- $32.2 MillionIndustrial / Workplace
Failure to maintain proper safety protocols led to an explosion at an industrial plant causing a series of catastrophic injuries from broken bones, burns, spinal injury, and mental anguish.
- $31.5 MillionIndustrial / Workplace
Brain and spinal injuries followed an oil-field company failing to maintain equipment and provide a safe work site.
- $1.6 MillionIndustrial / Workplace
At a worksite, an excavator operator dropped a crane mat onto our client.
- $1.3 MillionIndustrial / Workplace
An oil-field safety violation injured our client.
- $977,873Industrial / Workplace
The other vehicle failed to yield the right of way and collided with our client, who suffered back injuries.
- $740,000Industrial / Workplace
The at-fault driver failed to yield the right of way and collided with our client, who suffered neck injuries.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes; each case is decided on its own facts.
What Is a Maritime Lawyer in Shreveport, Louisiana?
Definition of a Maritime Lawyer Under Federal Admiralty Law
A maritime lawyer works inside the federal body of law that reaches injuries and deaths connected to the water and to the vessels that run on it. That is a different set of rules from the state negligence law that decides a wreck on I-20 or a fall in a store on Texas Street. Anyone handling your case has to decide first whether your injury touches the federal framework at all.
That decision is not academic. A land injury runs on Louisiana deadlines and Louisiana fault rules. A water-connected injury can run on a different deadline, a different fault standard, and remedies built for people who work on the water. Get the order wrong and you can start the wrong clock and lose options nobody told you existed.
Geographic Scope: Shreveport, Red River, and Gulf-Connected Waters
Shreveport sits on the Red River, and the Red River is a working river. Barges, tows, and the crews who run them move cargo through the Port of Caddo-Bossier every week. So a river job in this parish can raise the maritime question instead of settling quietly into ordinary state tort law. You do not have to leave the Shreveport-Bossier area for that question to matter to your claim.
The reach goes well past the river itself. Plenty of north Louisiana workers drive south to jobs on inland waters, in coastal ports, and offshore, then come home on their off week. A Shreveport address settles nothing. What settles it is where the work happened and what you were standing on when it happened.
When a Shreveport Injury Becomes a Maritime Case
Two questions decide whether maritime law governs: location and the nature of the work. Was the injury on or over the water, and did it arise from work with a maritime connection? A body of water being nearby is not enough on its own. A plant beside the river is still a plant.
Answer those two early and the shape of the whole claim follows from them: the filing deadline, the fault standard, the damages available, and often the court where the case belongs. Federal maritime cases for this area are heard in the Western District of Louisiana. Mapping your facts against those lines is the first work a local maritime lawyer does, because the answer decides which set of rules protects you.
Do this week: write down every vessel you set foot on in the past year, who owned it, and roughly how many days you spent aboard each one. That list is where the status analysis starts, and no records clerk can reconstruct it as well as you can.
Local Office. Statewide Record.
- Across the street
From the 1st JDC
Our 509 Milam St office sits across the street from the First Judicial District Court, where Shreveport injury suits are filed and tried.
- 11
Trial attorneys, one team
Your case is handled by the firm's own trial attorneys, and we respond in minutes, 24/7.
- 24/7
We come to you
Hospital, home, or the office at 509 Milam St. Free case review, and no fee unless we win.
- 122
Cases resolved over $1 million
Verdicts and settlements of $1 million or more, won by the same trial team that handles Shreveport cases.
Can Maritime Law Apply to Injuries in Shreveport and North Louisiana?
Yes. Maritime law reaches injuries in north Louisiana when the work happened on navigable water aboard a vessel, and it reaches a Shreveport-based worker hurt offshore. Living inland decides nothing. The water, the vessel, and your connection to that vessel decide it. A deckhand hurt on the Red River and a Shreveport hand hurt on a Gulf platform can both be maritime claimants, though one never crossed the parish line and the other worked hundreds of miles from home.
What drives it is whether the injury has a maritime location and a maritime connection, not where you live and not the courthouse where the suit eventually lands.
The Red River as a Working Navigable Waterway
The Red River carries barge traffic, ties into the broader inland waterway system, and moves commercial cargo through Shreveport and Bossier City. That commercial character is why an injury aboard a vessel on that water gets treated differently from an ordinary injury on land a hundred yards away.
The difference is practical for you. A towboat crew member, a barge worker, or a dredge hand hurt on the Red River near Shreveport or Bossier City often has more on the table than a state workers’ compensation claim pays. The same reasoning runs to other working stretches of river in the region and to the port facilities that tie into them, because the answer changes which body of law measures your claim.
Vessel-Based Work vs. Land-Based Work
The line that most often decides coverage is whether your work was vessel-based or land-based. A job that connects you to a vessel in navigation, with meaningful time spent aboard, generally sits inside maritime law. A job fixed to land, a manufacturing floor or a warehouse yard, generally does not, even when the building sits on the riverbank.
The gray zones are where these cases turn. Split your shifts between a dock and a barge, or load and unload vessels from shore, and you may land in a different framework than the crew member who eats and sleeps aboard the boat. Those distinctions decide which claim you can bring and against whom, questions that seaman status and longshore coverage settle further down this page. The narrow point here: being near the water is not enough by itself. The relationship between you and a vessel is what pulls a north Louisiana injury toward maritime law.
It also explains why vessel conditions carry weight later. Gaps in maintenance, crew training, or dock procedure become the disputed facts once a claim is filed.
Where a Maritime Injury Claim Can Be Filed
A maritime injury does not lock the case into one type of courtroom. You often have a choice about where to file, including the option to bring the case close to home. The features that make maritime claims different, the seaman remedies and the fault standards, travel with the case whichever building it lands in.
That choice can change how the case is handled. Hurt on the Red River or offshore, you may be able to file in a Caddo Parish courtroom at 501 Texas Street rather than travel for every hearing. Whether state court or federal court serves your claim better turns on the defendants, the remedies at stake, and where the incident happened. That is one of the first calls to make with a lawyer, because it shapes the path of the case from the outset.
Injuries Offshore for Shreveport-Based Commuters
Plenty of north Louisiana residents work offshore. A crew member who lives in Shreveport, Bossier City, or Minden, commutes to the Gulf, and gets hurt on a rig, a supply boat, or a platform can bring a maritime claim even though home is far inland. Where the injury happened on the water drives the analysis, not the address on your driver license.
This is a common pattern here. Offshore work draws from a wide labor pool across north Louisiana, and an injury on Gulf waters stays a maritime matter regardless of where the worker sleeps between hitches. The drive between home and the water changes nothing about the law that applies out there.
Do this week: pull your last twelve months of pay stubs and hitch schedules into one folder. They show where you worked and how long you were aboard, and they answer the location question before anyone can argue about it.
Who Qualifies as a Jones Act Seaman in Louisiana?
Seaman status is the threshold question in a Jones Act case, and it turns on your relationship to a vessel rather than your job title. The Jones Act is the federal law that lets a qualifying seaman pursue a negligence claim against an employer for an injury suffered in the course of employment. Before that path opens, you have to qualify as a seaman, a question courts sort out by looking at how your work connects to a vessel. Two workers doing similar tasks can land on opposite sides of that line, and where they fall shapes which remedies come into play.
The Seaman Status Test
Seaman status comes down to two ideas. The first asks whether your duties contribute to the function of a vessel or the accomplishment of its mission. The second asks whether you have a connection to a vessel in navigation that is substantial in both duration and nature. The nature side looks at whether the work exposes you to the perils of the sea. The duration side looks at how much of your working time you spend aboard, and a rough figure of around 30 percent of work time in service of a vessel is sometimes cited as a general guide rather than a precise rule.
Treat that percentage as a marker, not a cutoff. If you split time between the shore and a vessel, the whole employment gets examined, not the single day you were hurt. Because status sits at the front of the case, how it comes out shapes everything after it.
Connection to a Vessel or Fleet of Vessels
The connection does not have to run to one named boat. A worker assigned to a fleet of vessels under common ownership or control can generally build the duration side by adding up time across those vessels. That matters for crews who rotate among several rigs, barges, or towboats run by the same company.
The vessel generally needs to be in navigation, meaning afloat, in operation, capable of moving, and on navigable waters. A vessel does not necessarily lose that character because it is moored, anchored, or between voyages. A structure permanently fixed to the bottom, or pulled out of service for major reconstruction, may not count, and that distinction is often where the argument over status lives.
Barge, Tow, and Dredge Workers in Northwest Louisiana
Work on the Red River and the connected inland waters can support seaman status when the facts line up. Deckhands on towboats and tugs, crew assigned to working barges, and hands aboard dredges doing channel maintenance may qualify when their duties contribute to the vessel mission and their time aboard is substantial. A dredge that moves under its own power, or gets repositioned as it works, can be treated as a vessel in the right circumstances.
The analysis stays driven by facts. A barge worker who spends most shifts loading from a fixed dock, with only occasional time aboard, can fall short on the duration side even though the job sounds maritime start to finish. We read the actual assignment records, timesheets, and job descriptions rather than the label on a paycheck.
Commercial Divers on Inland Waters
Divers raise the status question over and over on inland rivers and lakes. A diver tied to a vessel, launching from it, tending its equipment, and contributing to its operation, can fit the seaman framework on the right facts. A diver sent to a fixed platform or a bridge pier with no real vessel connection may fall under a different set of rules instead. Because both duration and nature apply, the same diver can qualify on one project and not the next, so the specific assignment tends to control. We read the dive logs, the vessel involvement, and the scope of each assignment before drawing any conclusion about status.
Do this week: ask your employer in writing for your assignment records and timesheets covering the last two years. They are the duration evidence, and they are easier to get before anyone knows a claim is coming.
What Types of Cases Do Shreveport Maritime Lawyers Handle?
Maritime injury work covers a defined set of case types, each tied to a different federal law depending on your status and where you were hurt. A Shreveport maritime practice sees Jones Act seaman claims, Longshore and Harbor Workers claims, vessel accidents on inland rivers and tows, offshore platform and oilfield injuries, and claims that reach vessel owners. Jurisdiction is what separates these from an ordinary land injury case. The same fall that would be a state workers compensation matter on a factory floor becomes a federal maritime case when it happens aboard a vessel on navigable water. That difference decides who pays, what you can seek, and which court hears it.
Jones Act Seaman Injury Claims
A Jones Act claim belongs to a worker who qualifies as a seaman, meaning someone with a substantial connection to a vessel in navigation. When that worker is hurt because the employer was negligent, the Jones Act supplies a negligence cause of action against the employer, which is a different animal from the no-fault schemes that cover most land-based jobs. These cases turn on proving fault and on establishing seaman status, and they reach damages a workers compensation claim never pays. Who counts as a seaman, and how the negligence standard works, are covered below.
Longshore and Harbor Worker (LHWCA) Claims
Not every maritime worker is a seaman. Dockworkers, ship repairers, shipbuilders, and harbor workers who load, unload, or service vessels fall under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act instead. The LHWCA is a federal no-fault system: an injured longshore worker collects medical care and wage-replacement benefits without proving the employer did anything wrong. Because coverage depends on the work and its location relative to navigable water, sorting a claim into LHWCA rather than state compensation or the Jones Act is usually the first question.
Tugboat, Towboat, and Barge Accidents
Inland waterway traffic drives a large share of maritime injury work in Louisiana. Deckhands, tankermen, and pilots on tugboats, towboats, and barges face line-handling hazards, deck falls, and vessel collisions. A crew member hurt on a working tow usually brings a Jones Act claim as a seaman, while a shore-based worker hurt while a barge is moored may fall under the longshore act. These cases require locking down the vessel logs, crew statements, and maintenance records before that evidence disappears, because the mechanism of a towing accident is rarely obvious after the fact.
Offshore Oilfield and Platform Injuries
Offshore energy work generates its own category. Your remedy depends on whether you were hurt aboard a vessel, on a fixed platform, or on a mobile drilling unit, and on what your assigned duties were. Crew serving aboard drillships, jack-up rigs, and supply and crew boats commonly pursue Jones Act claims, while platform workers and service-company personnel may fall under other frameworks. Establishing which law governs is the pivotal early analysis, and it decides both the damages available and the party who answers for them.
Unseaworthiness and Vessel Owner Negligence
A vessel injury often involves more than your direct employer. When the vessel itself or its equipment is part of what went wrong, the case can reach the party responsible for that vessel, and that party is not always the company that signs your checks. One injury aboard a boat frequently produces two lines of inquiry: what the employer did or failed to do, and the condition of the vessel and its gear. Separating those threads early can widen the list of parties who answer for the injury instead of leaving you with a single target.
Do this week: name the boat. Write down the vessel name, its owner, the operator, and every company whose crew was working near you that day. That list is what turns one defendant into all the defendants.
Shreveport Practice Areas
Car AccidentsRear-end, intersection, and highway collisions across Louisiana.
Truck Accidents18-wheeler and commercial-vehicle wrecks governed by federal trucking rules.
Catastrophic InjuryBrain, spinal-cord, amputation, and severe-burn injuries that change a life.
Wrongful DeathClaims brought by families after a fatal accident or act of negligence.
Premises LiabilitySlip-and-fall and unsafe-property injuries on someone else's premises.
Product LiabilityInjuries caused by defective or unreasonably dangerous products.
Oilfield AccidentsDrilling, pipeline, and refinery injuries across the energy sector.
Industrial AccidentsPlant, warehouse, and heavy-equipment injuries in industrial settings.
Offshore AccidentsRig, platform, and vessel injuries beyond the shoreline.
What Are Jones Act Seaman Injury Claims?
A Jones Act seaman claim usually runs several remedies at once, which is why it looks nothing like a land-based work injury. There is a negligence claim against your employer, a separate no-fault benefit that covers living costs and treatment, and a claim aimed at the condition of the vessel itself. Together they are what let an injured seaman pursue broader damages than a shore-based system pays. Most seaman cases run all three side by side, because each reaches a different defendant or a different kind of loss.
Jones Act Negligence Against Maritime Employers
The Jones Act lets a seaman sue the employer for negligence when the employer’s carelessness plays a part in causing the injury. In general terms, you show that the employer’s fault contributed to the harm. That contributing-cause framing is usually described as a lighter causation showing than the standard used in most land-based injury cases.
Employer negligence takes many forms on the water. An unsafe work order. Training nobody actually gave. A short-handed crew. A broken piece of equipment left in service. A safety procedure the company wrote and then ignored. When any of those helps cause the injury, the negligence claim opens the door to lost wages, lost future earning capacity, and pain and suffering.
Maintenance and Cure: The Baseline Entitlement
Maintenance and cure is the seaman’s no-fault benefit, and it is the part of these cases that does not turn on who was at fault. Because it does not depend on proving negligence, it typically starts well before any lawsuit is resolved. An injured or ill seaman generally receives it from the employer while treatment for the condition continues.
Maintenance is a daily living allowance for food and lodging ashore while you heal. Cure covers the reasonable cost of medical treatment for the injury or illness. The benefit runs on its own track, separate from the damages you may pursue through the negligence and vessel-condition theories, so you can be drawing it while those claims are still being built.
Unseaworthiness Claims Against Vessel Owners
An unseaworthiness claim targets the vessel owner rather than the employer, and it is distinct from Jones Act negligence. In general, the owner is expected to provide a vessel reasonably fit for its intended use. When some part of the vessel is not fit, whether the hull, the gear, the crew, or the working conditions, the vessel can be treated as unseaworthy.
A frayed line, a defective winch, a crew too small or too green for the job, an unsafe method of work, or footing nobody kept clean can each support this kind of claim. Because the vessel owner and the employer are sometimes different companies, this theory can reach a defendant the negligence claim cannot. That reach is why seaman cases usually plead unseaworthiness alongside the negligence count.
Comparative Fault Under Maritime Law
Maritime law generally follows a pure comparative fault approach. If you are partly responsible for the injury, your damages are reduced by that percentage, but you are not barred from compensation. Say a jury puts 40 percent of the fault on you: you still collect 60 percent of proven damages, and even a seaman assigned a high share keeps the remainder.
That differs from fault rules that cut a claim off entirely once the injured person crosses a threshold; under the pure comparative approach there is generally no such cutoff. The distinction matters because maritime employers argue almost as a reflex that the worker caused or worsened the injury. Even when a jury accepts part of that argument, it shrinks the award rather than erasing it, and it does not touch the maintenance and cure the employer owes apart from any fault finding.
Do this week: if maintenance payments have started, write down the daily rate and the date of the first check. If they have not started, put your request to the employer in writing today and keep a copy.
What Are Longshore and Harbor Worker (LHWCA) Claims Near Shreveport?
Longshore and Harbor Worker claims are federal benefits claims for maritime workers who are not seamen. The Act often governs the injury of someone who loads, unloads, builds, or repairs vessels and works on navigable water or on the adjoining docks, piers, terminals, and marine-related areas. It is a benefits program, not a fault lawsuit against the employer, which changes both what you can collect and how you go about it. Whether it covers your injury turns on the nature of the job and the location of the site.
If you work the docks, a shipyard, or barge loading on inland water out of the Shreveport area, this is often your framework. Two steps drive the claim early: reporting the injury to the employer and filing the formal claim. Both windows are short, and letting one pass can end a solid claim. We pin those dates down the week of the injury.
Who Is Covered by the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act
Coverage turns on the kind of work and where it happens. The work side asks whether the job is maritime in nature: longshore loading and unloading, shipbuilding, ship repair, ship-breaking. The location side asks whether the injury happened on the water or on an adjoining area used to load, unload, repair, or build a vessel.
That location reach extends past the water itself. Get hurt on a pier, a wharf, a dry dock, a terminal, or a marine railway and you may be covered even though you never stepped aboard a vessel. Seamen are handled separately, because their injuries run through the Jones Act. For non-seaman maritime workers, the Longshore Act is the usual starting point, and whether it reaches a given injury comes back to the nature of the work and the location of the site.
Longshore Benefits for Medical Care and Lost Wages
Longshore benefits are structured rather than open-ended. A covered worker receives reasonable and necessary medical treatment for the work injury, which can include surgery, physical therapy, and follow-up care. Because the claim is built around benefits rather than proving employer fault, medical care is often available without first litigating who caused the accident.
Wage-replacement benefits track the severity and duration of the disability, sorted into categories separating temporary from permanent and total from partial. Payments are calculated from your wage history and capped. A worker who cannot return to the same job may also get vocational rehabilitation. Fights over the benefit level are routine, so we build the wage record early enough that the calculation holds up later.
Third-Party Lawsuits Outside LHWCA Benefits
Benefits are generally the exclusive remedy against your employer, but they are not always the only source of compensation. When someone other than the employer caused or contributed to the injury, you can pursue a separate lawsuit against that party for damages the benefit schedule does not provide, including pain and suffering.
Common third-party defendants include a vessel owner whose vessel was unsafe, an equipment manufacturer whose product failed, or a contractor whose crew created the hazard. A longshore worker’s negligence claim against a vessel is a recognized part of this framework. The third-party suit runs alongside the benefits claim, and the insurer that paid benefits usually holds a lien against any third-party award. Coordinating the two so you keep as much of the money as possible is a large part of how we handle these files.
When LHWCA Coverage Applies vs. Louisiana Workers’ Compensation
A Shreveport-area worker hurt on the job may fall under this federal framework, under the Louisiana workers compensation system, or, in some situations, under both. The dividing line is maritime status and location. Loading a barge on navigable water or repairing a vessel at a marine facility points to the federal side. A purely land-based warehouse or manufacturing job with no maritime connection points to Louisiana state compensation.
The line is not always clean, and the two systems pay differently. Federal benefit rates, medical rules, and procedures differ from the Louisiana scheme, and filing in the wrong system can cost you benefits. Where an injury sits near the line, we analyze the specific work, the specific location, and the specific vessel connection before anything is filed, and where coverage overlaps we work out how the two systems interact.
Do this week: put your injury report in writing to your employer, date it, and keep a copy for yourself. A verbal report to a foreman is not the written notice this system requires.
What Is the Difference Between Jones Act and Longshore (LHWCA) Claims in Louisiana?
The Jones Act and the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (LHWCA) cover different groups of workers and work in different ways. The Jones Act is for seamen, workers with a substantial connection to a vessel in navigation, and it lets a seaman sue the employer over the injury. The LHWCA is for maritime workers who are not seamen, and it pays scheduled benefits without any showing that the employer was negligent. You land on one side or the other, seaman or shoreside maritime worker, and which side fits shapes the rest of the case.
Seaman Status vs. Land-Based Maritime Worker
Which track your case runs on turns on your relationship to a vessel. A seaman contributes to the work of a vessel in navigation and has a connection to it substantial in both duration and nature. Deckhands, mates, engineers, and crew aboard tugs, towboats, barges, and dredges sit on the seaman side of that line.
The LHWCA covers maritime employment that does not rise to seaman status. Longshore workers, ship repairers, harbor construction crews, and dock personnel are the classic examples. A master or member of a crew of a vessel sits outside LHWCA coverage, which is why the two categories stay separate instead of overlapping. Sorting which one fits you is usually the first question in a maritime injury case, because the answer drives much of what follows.
Fault-Based vs. No-Fault Compensation
The Jones Act is a fault-based route. A seaman proceeds by showing the employer’s negligence played a part in the injury, so the claim rests on identifying something the employer did wrong. Separately, that same seaman has a maintenance and cure entitlement that does not depend on fault at all.
The LHWCA is a no-fault system. A covered worker collects statutory benefits without proving employer negligence, and without the worker’s own carelessness defeating the claim. The trade is that LHWCA benefits are fixed by statute rather than proven case by case. You give up the ability to sue your employer over the injury in exchange for a benefit that does not depend on assigning blame.
Damages Available Under Each Framework
Because the Jones Act route is a lawsuit, a seaman who proves the case can seek a broad range of damages: past and future lost wages, lost earning capacity, medical costs, and pain and suffering. Maintenance and cure runs alongside those damages, covering daily living expenses and medical treatment until the seaman reaches maximum medical improvement.
The LHWCA pays a defined schedule of benefits rather than jury-determined damages. It covers medical treatment for the work injury and wage-replacement compensation calculated as a percentage of average weekly wage, with amounts and durations set by statute. LHWCA benefits do not include an award for pain and suffering. A land-based maritime worker who wants damages beyond the statutory schedule looks to a third party, not to the employer.
Differences Between LHWCA and Louisiana Workers’ Compensation
The LHWCA is federal, and it is not the same thing as Louisiana workers compensation. Both are no-fault wage-and-medical systems, but they define covered employment and covered locations differently and calculate wage replacement differently. Which one governs depends on the work and where it happened, not on where you live.
An injury tied to maritime employment on or beside navigable water generally lands with the federal LHWCA; an ordinary land-based job injury is handled under Louisiana workers compensation. That classification sets the benefits available and the deadlines that apply, and we work through it with you before a claim goes out the door.
Do this week: get a copy of your job description and any written safety or crew assignment policy from your employer. Those documents describe the work, and the work is what decides which of these two systems you are in.
What Injuries Are Common in Louisiana Maritime Accident Claims?
Maritime work packs heavy loads, moving machinery, and unstable footing into a small space, and it produces a predictable set of serious injuries. The common ones are spine and joint injuries from lifting and slipping, crush and amputation injuries from lines and machinery, falls on decks and gangways, burns and chemical exposure, and drownings. What you were hurt with shapes the claim: which medical evidence matters, how long treatment runs, whether the case becomes a survival or death claim. Documenting the injury early, and tying it to the vessel or the conditions that caused it, is the difference between a claim that holds and one that gets whittled down.
Back, Neck, Shoulder, and Knee Injuries
Spine and joint injuries are the workhorse injuries of maritime work. Deckhands, riggers, and platform hands lift, pull, and carry in awkward positions on surfaces that pitch and roll, and that repetition produces herniated discs, torn rotator cuffs, and meniscus tears. One event, a fall, a sudden pull on a line, a load that shifts, can rupture a disc that a shore worker might have strained over twenty years.
These are the injuries people try to work through, which creates a paper problem later. The employer or its insurer will argue the herniated disc is degenerative, or that the shoulder tear predated the job. Prompt imaging and an accurate report of how it happened are the answer. Many of these injuries end in surgery and permanent work restrictions, which is why lost earning capacity, not just this month’s wages, drives the value of the claim.
Crush Injuries, Amputations, and Line-Snap Accidents
Mooring lines and tow wires carry enormous tension, and when one parts under load it comes back across the deck like a whip. A snapped line can take a limb, fracture a skull, or kill anyone standing in the snap-back zone. These are among the most severe accidents in maritime work because the forces involved leave no margin.
Crush injuries follow the same pattern. Barges shift, cargo swings, hatches drop, and machinery pins hands and feet against fixed steel. The results run from broken bones to traumatic amputation. Those cases turn on the condition of the equipment and the safety procedures: whether the line was worn past service life, whether the crew was standing in a danger zone, whether a guard or a lockout was in place. Preserving the physical evidence, the failed line, the machine, the maintenance logs, matters before any of it is repaired or thrown out.
Falls on Decks, Gangways, and Docks
Wet steel, oil, missing non-skid coating, and poorly lit walkways make maritime surfaces treacherous. Falls happen on decks, across gangways between vessel and dock, and down ladders and hatches. A fall from height into a hold or off a gangway can cause a traumatic brain injury, a spinal fracture, or a death; even a fall on the same level can tear a shoulder or shatter a wrist.
The physical condition of the vessel is usually the core issue. Whether the claim runs as unseaworthiness against the owner or as negligence against the employer, the questions are the same: was the deck maintained, was the gangway rigged and lit, was the hazard flagged or cleaned up. Photographs of the condition that put you down, taken before repairs, carry real weight.
Burns, Explosions, and Chemical Exposure
Vessels and offshore platforms run on fuel, high-pressure systems, and volatile cargo, which keeps fire and explosion risk constant. Engine-room fires, fuel and gas ignitions, and cargo explosions cause severe burns, blast injuries, and lung damage from smoke and fumes. Burn injuries in particular demand long, expensive treatment, including skin grafts and repeated surgeries, and they often leave permanent scarring and disability.
Chemical exposure is the quieter hazard. Workers handle solvents, drilling fluids, cleaning agents, and toxic cargo, and exposure can cause respiratory disease, chemical burns, and long-term organ damage. Because the harm sometimes surfaces long after the exposure, medical records connecting the condition to the work environment matter as much as the incident report. These cases turn on equipment maintenance, ventilation, and whether the protective gear was adequate.
Drowning and Fatal Maritime Accidents
The water itself is the ultimate hazard of the work. Workers go overboard in rough seas, get pulled under by machinery or lines, or are trapped when a vessel capsizes or floods. Drownings and near-drownings, which can cause severe brain injury from oxygen loss, remain a leading cause of death in the industry.
When a maritime worker dies, the injury becomes the basis for a death claim, and the family’s rights depend on where and how the death happened. Fatal offshore incidents raise questions about man-overboard procedures, life-saving equipment, and rescue response. The mechanics of maritime wrongful death and survival claims, including who may bring them and which statutes govern deaths at sea, are covered further down this page. Documenting the cause of death, the vessel safety systems, and the response cannot wait.
Do this week: get seen and keep the appointment after that one. If the injury is severe, the Level I trauma center at Ochsner LSU Health Shreveport on Kings Highway is where you want to be; Willis-Knighton and CHRISTUS Highland handle the rest. Tell the intake nurse exactly what you were doing on the vessel when it happened, and make sure that sentence lands in the chart.
Who Can Be Liable for a Maritime Injury in Louisiana?
A maritime injury usually involves more than one responsible party, and finding every one of them changes what you can pursue. The employer is the obvious defendant. A contractor on the job, an equipment manufacturer, a vessel operator, and the company running the dock or terminal can each carry separate responsibility. One accident can support one claim against one party and a different claim against another. Sorting out who did what is the work that shapes a maritime case.
Maritime Employers
The maritime employer comes first because the employment relationship is what triggers the core seaman protections. The employer answers for negligence that plays a part in causing an injury, and it owes maintenance and cure. Its duty covers its officers, its captains, its crew, and the systems it put in place aboard the vessel. An unsafe order, an untrained crewmate, a safety procedure nobody followed, a known hazard nobody fixed: each traces back to the employer, which is why it stays central even when other parties share the fault.
Vessel Owners and Operators
The vessel owner is a separate party who can be in the case even though it never employed you. When the condition of a vessel or its equipment plays a part in the injury, the owner belongs in the file alongside the employer. On many jobs the employer and the owner are the same company. Where they are not, you may have a claim against the owner apart from anything you bring against the employer, and identifying that split early is one of the first steps in mapping who answers.
Operators who control a vessel without owning it can also be in the picture. A company that charters, manages, or directs a vessel may hold duties over its condition and its crew, and a lapse there can support responsibility. Whether the owner and the operator are the same company clarifies who each claim runs against.
Contractors and Subcontractors
Vessels and offshore sites are crowded with companies that never employed you. A contractor doing repairs, a subcontractor running a specialized crew, a staffing company supplying labor, a service outfit brought aboard for one job: any of them can create the hazard that hurt you. When one of them is negligent, you can sue it separately, outside the employer relationship, which reaches conduct that sits outside a compensation-only framework.
Equipment Manufacturers
The company that designed, built, or sold defective equipment can answer when the defect causes injury. Winches, cranes, cables, valves, deck machinery, and safety gear fail in ways that hurt maritime workers. A manufacturer that puts an unreasonably dangerous product into service, through a design flaw, a manufacturing defect, or an inadequate warning, may answer in a product claim. That route does not depend on your status as a seaman or on anything your employer did. It turns on the condition of the product.
Dock, Terminal, and Facility Operators
Not every maritime injury happens on the water. Docks, wharves, terminals, and shoreside facilities carry a great deal of loading, unloading, and vessel servicing, and the companies that run those spaces owe a duty to keep them reasonably safe. A poorly maintained gangway, an unlit walkway, an obstructed dock, or an unsafe loading procedure can put a worker down between ship and shore. When the operator fails in that duty, it can answer alongside or apart from the employer and the vessel owner, which is often what widens a case to reach the party that actually controlled the hazard.
Do this week: photograph every logo you can find, on the equipment, the hard hats, the trailers, the dock signage. Company names on a photograph are how a one-defendant case turns into a case against everyone whose conduct put you in the hospital.
What Compensation Can a Shreveport Maritime Injury Victim Recover?
A Shreveport maritime worker can collect past and future medical costs, lost wages, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, and maintenance and cure. The mix depends on which framework covers you, because a seaman, a longshore worker, and a general maritime claimant do not draw from the same set of damages. For a seaman, the largest categories come from the negligence claim against the employer and from the separate entitlement to maintenance and cure. The negligence damages cover lost wages, lost future earning capacity, and pain and suffering, and maintenance and cure runs on its own track beside them.
What any one category is worth turns on the evidence. Medical records, wage histories, an economist’s earning-capacity analysis, and testimony from the doctor who treated you each carry a piece of the number. The subsections below break down what each category covers and where the fights usually start.
Medical Expenses and Future Treatment
Medical damages cover the full arc of treatment, not just the bills already run up: emergency care, surgery, hospitalization, physical therapy, imaging, prescriptions, and the future procedures a physician projects. A serious back or shoulder injury often takes more than one surgery, and the number has to account for that.
Documenting future care is where these claims are won or lost. A life-care plan and testimony from your treating physician establish what the injury will demand years out, and those projections convert into present-value dollars an economist can calculate. Without that record, an adjuster prices your future care at zero.
Lost Wages and Loss of Earning Capacity
Lost wages cover the income already missed while you are off the job. Loss of earning capacity is the bigger and more contested category: it measures the difference between what you could have earned over a full career and what the injury now allows. A deckhand who can no longer lift, climb, or work offshore may be looking at lower-paying land work for the next thirty years.
Maritime pay usually runs above shore wages because it includes overtime, hitch pay, and found, the value of room and board aboard the vessel. A correct earning-capacity figure captures all of it. We work with vocational experts and economists to build the wage base, project the career you would have had, and reduce the loss to present value.
Pain, Suffering, and Disability
Pain and suffering compensates for the physical pain, the mental anguish, and the loss of enjoyment of life the injury causes. Disability damages address permanent limits: a fused spine, a lost limb, pain that never fully resolves. These are non-economic damages, and they are available to a seaman pursuing a negligence claim against the employer.
There is no formula, so this category leans on credible medical documentation and your own consistent account of what you can and cannot do in a day. The gap between a fully documented claim and a thin one is wide.
Maintenance and Cure Benefits
Maintenance and cure belongs to seamen alone and stands apart from any negligence claim. Maintenance is a daily living allowance covering food and lodging ashore while you heal. Cure covers the reasonable medical expenses of treating the injury. The employer owes both regardless of who was at fault, and they continue until you reach maximum medical improvement, the point where further treatment will not improve the condition.
The friction usually comes from the daily maintenance rate, which employers try to fix at an outdated or inadequate figure, and from disputes over whether maximum medical improvement has actually been reached. You can pursue maintenance and cure at the same time as a negligence claim, and the two are not offset against each other.
Withheld Maintenance and Cure
When an employer stops paying maintenance and cure it owes, you can pursue the withheld benefits along with the cost of forcing the employer to pay. That added exposure sits on top of the ordinary maintenance and cure obligation rather than replacing it.
Because the obligation is no-fault, an employer that halts payments to squeeze a settlement, or that ignores a treating physician’s recommendation for further care, still owes the benefit. Documenting each denial, each unpaid bill, and each disregarded medical recommendation is what supports that claim.
Do this week: start a single folder. Every medical bill, every explanation of benefits, every maintenance check stub, every letter from the employer or its adjuster, in date order. That folder is the damages case, and it is far easier to build as it happens than to reconstruct a year from now.
What Shreveport Clients Say
- Emma Dvorak
I was overwhelmed dealing with everything after my injury, but their team took a lot of the pressure off of me.They were patient, answered all my questions, and made sure I understood what was happening.
- Diane Didier
I was recommended to Trey Morris by a friend, and they have been amazing!They kept me up to date with all the details of my case. I was in the loop during the entire process. Having to go over the details my accident was so uncomfortable, but they were so understanding and made every effort to make the entire process as smooth as possible. I would highly recommend Trey Morris and his team to anyone.
- Laurie Shearin
I'll always appreciate the way I was treated here.I felt heard, respected and taken care of from beginning to end.
- Zachary Krengle
Trey Morris and the team treated me so well after my accident.Beyond taking the steps to make sure my case was taken care of timely and apropiatelly. They listened and made me feel like I was a priority to them and not just another client. I hope none of my friends are put in a situation to need them, but if they do I would highly suggest Trey Morris and the team.
- Valorie Schneider
Really glad I chose Trey Morris Injury Law.They were easy to work with and made sure I understood what was going on.
- Alayna Cantrell
I would recommend Trey Morris to my friends and family.Trey Morris & the team there helped me with my case. The firm is amazing!
- Sunshine Halpert
This is the firm you want handling your car accident.Trey Morris Injury Lawyers is the best. Jessica, Seth, and Brian handled my case quickly. They kept me up to date and infor ed the whole time. I will send everyone I know to you guys. Thanks so much!
- Alyx Braud
My mans Trey Trey got it done!All the people at the firm were super friendly and they really made me feel like they cared about my case as much as I did. It didn't take too long and I got my settlement 🤑
- Raley Snead
I had a great experience with Morris Injury Attorneys.Everyone is professional, responsive, and kept me / my loved ones updated throughout the entire process. They made everything easy to understand and handled our cases quickly. I'm really pleased with the outcome and would definitely recommend them to anyone who needs a good injury attorney.
- Annabelle Lee
Trey morris injury lawyers handled my case with the utmost professionalism.I will definitely be recommending to any friends and family!!
- Lindsie Waguespack
Trey Morris Injury lawyers handled my claim with so much professionalism!Thank yall for everything!!
- LAM Rogers
Trey Morris and his team were the only attorneys i needed to call.After I was in an accident they helped my case and got me a settlement I am very happy with. They were very professional. I recommend them highly. Thank you to the whole office at Tray Morris.
How Do Maritime Wrongful Death and Survival Claims Work?
When a maritime worker dies, two separate claims can come out of the same incident. A wrongful death claim addresses what the surviving family lost. A survival action carries forward the damages the worker himself sustained before he died. Which body of federal maritime law applies often turns on where the fatal incident happened, measured from shore, and on the worker status. Those two factors set who can bring the claim and what damages are on the table.
Death Far From Shore
Deaths caused by wrongful conduct well out at sea, beyond a few nautical miles from the United States shoreline, are generally handled under a distinct federal framework for high-seas deaths. A personal representative of the deceased typically brings the action on behalf of a spouse, children, parents, or dependent relatives.
Damages that far out focus on financial loss: the support the worker would have provided, lost services, and funeral expenses, rather than grief or the family mental anguish. That is why the location gets pinned down early. A death nearer to shore can fall under a different body of maritime law with a broader measure of damages.
Wrongful Death in Near-Shore Waters
For deaths closer to land, in state territorial waters reaching a few nautical miles out, general maritime law is understood to provide its own wrongful death remedy. That near-shore remedy fills what was once a gap that left many maritime deaths without a clear federal avenue.
A general maritime wrongful death claim can reach deaths on inland navigable waters and in the near-shore zone, which takes in the Red River corridor and the Gulf-connected waters where workers from around Shreveport earn their living. Damages near shore can be broader than the financial-loss focus of high-seas deaths, so the exact site of the incident and the worker status are threshold questions in every fatal case.
Survival Actions for the Decedent’s Pre-Death Damages
A survival action is separate from a wrongful death claim. It addresses the harm the worker personally suffered between the injury and death, rather than what the family lost afterward. The claim belongs to the estate and is pursued by the personal representative.
Survival damages can include the conscious pain and suffering before death, medical expenses incurred in that period, and wages lost between injury and death. When a worker dies after a period of suffering, the estate may pursue a survival action alongside the family wrongful death claim, so one incident produces two coordinated claims with different measures of damages.
Who May Bring a Maritime Death Claim
Who is entitled to file depends on the governing framework. In high-seas death actions and in survival actions, the personal representative of the estate brings the claim on behalf of the beneficiaries. When the worker was a Jones Act seaman, the Jones Act carries a wrongful death remedy that runs to the surviving spouse, children, or dependent next of kin.
Standing, the governing law, and the correct beneficiaries get settled early, because those choices decide which damages are available and which court hears the case. We identify the site of the fatal incident, confirm the worker status, and determine which framework applies before the record around the death starts to disappear.
Do this week: if you lost someone, open the succession and get a personal representative appointed. The claim belongs to the estate, and until someone holds that appointment there is nobody with authority to file it.
How Long Do I Have to File a Maritime Injury Claim in Louisiana?
Your deadline depends on which body of maritime law governs the injury, and the two common frameworks run on very different clocks. A vessel-based seaman injury suit sits on a longer timeline. A land-based maritime worker faces a short written-notice window followed by a formal filing deadline. Miss the one that applies to you and the court or the compensation system can bar the claim no matter how strong the facts are. Because the framework that controls the deadline is tied to your status and to where you were hurt, the calendar matters from day one.
Deadlines by Worker Type
A seaman hurt aboard a vessel and a land-based maritime worker do not share a deadline. A vessel-based seaman personal injury lawsuit runs on a multi-year timeline, and that same longer period generally governs personal injury and unseaworthiness claims brought under general maritime law against a vessel owner. The clock usually starts the day of the injury, though in occupational or latent-injury situations it can run from the date you knew or should have known the injury was connected to the work.
A land-based maritime worker under the federal longshore framework faces a much tighter sequence: written notice to the employer within a short window, then a formal claim within a limited period measured from the injury or, for a condition that develops over time, from becoming aware of its connection to the work. The two systems do not overlap, so identifying which one applies is what fixes your deadline.
The Notice Requirement Most Workers Miss
The early written-notice step in the longshore framework is the trap. A worker who told a supervisor about the incident in the wheelhouse assumes that was enough. Spoken word to a foreman is not the written notice the system requires, and a missed notice step can undercut a claim long before the filing deadline ever arrives.
Exceptions and tolling situations can extend or excuse a deadline, but leaning on one is far riskier than meeting the deadline. Treat every window as firm and put the notice in writing early.
When More Than One Framework Could Apply
One incident can implicate more than one deadline, which is another reason status and location need settling early. Wrongful death claims can carry their own framework and their own timing, and both the deadlines and the available damages can differ from an ordinary injury suit. When more than one could apply, the shortest applicable deadline controls, so assume the earliest date on the calendar.
A commuting offshore worker, a barge deckhand on inland water, and a dockside worker can each face a different clock for the same calendar date. Sorting out which body of law governs is not a formality. It decides how much time your claim actually has.
Why Evidence Preservation Cannot Wait for the Deadline
The filing deadline is the outer limit, not the day work should begin. The proof that decides a maritime claim is perishable. Vessel logs, maintenance records, crew statements, safety-meeting minutes, and the physical condition of the equipment can all be altered, repaired, or overwritten within weeks. A preservation letter sent to the employer and the vessel owner in the first days after an injury holds that material in place, and it is one of the first things we do when a maritime case comes to our office on Milam Street.
Prompt medical documentation carries the same weight. A record tying the injury to the incident, and to the work restrictions that follow, is hard to rebuild later. Moving early protects both the deadline and the proof.
Do this week: write the date of the injury on a calendar you look at, and get the notice and the preservation letter out. Those two pieces of paper protect more of your claim than anything else you can do right now.
Your Shreveport Trial Team
The lawyers who work your file. Every Shreveport case is handled by the firm's own trial attorneys.
How Does a Maritime Injury Claim Work With a Shreveport Attorney?
A maritime claim moves through five stages: an early read of the facts and your status, a fast investigation of the vessel and the incident, careful documentation of the injury and the work restrictions, direct handling of the insurer and the adjuster, and then settlement, mediation, or trial. Each stage builds the record that decides what you are paid. Because these cases turn on federal law and on evidence that moves or disappears, the order and the speed of the steps matter as much as the merits.
Status and evidence come first. A worker hurt offshore or on inland water sometimes has more than one path to a courthouse, and we work that choice out at the start, not after the evidence begins to move.
Case Review and Seaman Status Analysis
The first step is a close read of what you did and where you did it. Maritime law treats a vessel-based seaman very differently from a land-based maritime worker, and the same injury can fall under different federal frameworks depending on that status. We look at how much of your time was spent aboard a vessel, what the job actually involved, and whether the vessel was in navigation.
That analysis drives every later decision. It sets which claims are available, who the defendants are, and which deadline controls. Getting it right at the start keeps you from filing under the wrong theory and losing time you cannot get back.
Vessel, Employer, and Incident Investigation
Maritime evidence does not wait. Deck logs, maintenance records, crew statements, incident reports, and vessel-inspection records routinely turn over before a claim is ever filed. We send a preservation letter early to require the employer and the vessel owner to hold that material, and we identify every party whose conduct or equipment may have contributed.
Investigation also fixes the physical facts before memories fade. That means photographing the scene and the equipment, finding the witnesses among the crew, and pulling records on the vessel condition and maintenance history. Where the case involves unsafe equipment or an unseaworthy vessel, those records often carry it.
Medical Evidence and Work Restriction Documentation
The medical record is the backbone of the damages claim. We document the diagnosis, the treatment plan, and the physician restrictions in a way that ties the injury to the incident and shows how it limits your ability to earn a living. Gaps or vague notes give an insurer room to dispute both the cause and the extent of the injury.
Work-restriction documentation carries extra weight here because earning capacity depends on physically demanding vessel work. A restriction that ends a career at sea supports a far larger loss than a temporary limit. We coordinate with your treating physicians and, where needed, with vocational and economic experts to put that loss in numbers.
Insurance and Claims Adjuster Communications
Maritime employers and vessel owners carry insurance, and their adjusters handle these claims every day. An early recorded statement and a quick, low offer are the standard opening moves, and both can undercut a claim before anyone knows what it is worth. We take those calls so you are not negotiating against a professional adjuster alone.
This stage also covers a seaman ongoing benefits while treatment continues. Insurers cut those off or underpay them, and a documented written demand is the first response. Keeping the paper trail clean here protects the claim and preserves any remedy for a wrongful denial.
Settlement, Mediation, or Trial
Most maritime claims settle, but the size of the settlement depends on how ready the case is for trial. We build each file as though it will be tried, because that readiness is what moves an insurer to pay full value. When the sides are close but not agreed, mediation with a neutral often closes the gap.
If the claim does not settle, it goes before the court where the suit was filed, which for federal maritime cases from this area is the Western District of Louisiana. A case built on preserved evidence, a clear status analysis, and a documented medical record is the one that holds up when a judge or jury decides it.
Do this week: bring us the date of the injury, the name of the vessel, and the name of your employer. That is enough to start the status analysis and get a preservation letter out while the logs still exist. Our office is at 509 Milam Street, across the street from the Caddo Parish Courthouse.