Longview Motorcycle Accident Lawyers

How Motorcycle Accidents Happen on Longview Roads

Motorcyclists are 28 times more likely per mile traveled to die in a motorcycle accident than passenger car occupants, according to NHTSA data. That disparity is not random. It reflects the specific ways roads and driver behavior interact with motorcycles.

I-20 through Longview is the primary high-crash corridor. Heavy freight traffic and commuter volume create conditions where motorcycles disappear from drivers’ awareness. Lane changes without mirror checks are a recurring cause of sideswipe crashes on I-20’s multi-lane sections. See our Longview truck accident lawyers page for more on commercial vehicle liability.

Loop 281 and Highway 80 are secondary crash corridors with a different profile. Intersections and on-ramps on Loop 281 produce left-turn violations at a disproportionate rate. A driver turning left across oncoming traffic misjudges a motorcycle’s speed or fails to see it entirely. This is the single most common crash type for motorcyclists nationwide, and Longview’s road geometry concentrates it at predictable locations.

Road hazard exposure on Highway 80 frontage roads is also elevated. Potholes, debris, and crumbling pavement that a car drives through without incident can cause a motorcycle to lose control entirely. When a public road defect causes a crash, the City of Longview or TxDOT may be a responsible party, depending on who maintains that road segment.

One issue that frequently comes up in Texas motorcycle cases: lane splitting. It is not legal in Texas. Riders who split lanes when the crash occurs may have their proportionate responsibility percentage raised by the insurer. This is not automatic, and it does not bar recovery if fault stays at 50% or below, but it is a real exposure that changes the liability calculus.

Texas Helmet Law and How It Affects Your Case

Tex. Transp. Code 661.003

Texas’s motorcycle helmet statute. Requires helmets for all riders under 21. Riders 21 and over may ride without a helmet only if they have completed a TxDOT-approved motorcycle safety course or carry health insurance with at least $10,000 in medical benefits.

Under Tex. Transp. Code 661.003, helmets are required for all riders under 21 with no exceptions. Riders 21 and over may ride without a helmet only if they have completed a TxDOT-approved motorcycle operator safety course or carry health insurance providing at least $10,000 in medical benefits.

A rider who does not meet either exemption and rides without a helmet is technically violating state law. That violation will be raised by the insurance adjuster as a basis for increasing the rider’s proportionate responsibility share under CPRC Chapter 33. This is not a technicality. Adjusters build fault arguments around it deliberately.

Texas does not bar helmetless riders from recovery entirely. It is a proportionate responsibility factor, not an absolute bar. If your fault share stays at 50% or below, you still recover. The amount is reduced by your percentage. The adjuster’s job is to push that percentage high enough to eliminate or severely reduce your claim.

The more specific dispute is medical causation. If you were not wearing a helmet and sustained a head or brain injury, the insurer will argue the choice to forgo a helmet directly worsened the injury. Countering that argument requires a biomechanical or medical expert who can establish what a helmet would or would not have changed for the specific mechanism of this crash.

Trey Morris Injury Lawyers has handled motorcycle cases where helmet absence was raised as a fault basis. The approach starts with securing medical records early and identifying the right expert before the insurer has already built its narrative.

Does Texas Proportionate Responsibility Apply Differently to Motorcyclists?

Stowers doctrine

A Texas common law rule holding that an insurer has a duty to accept a reasonable settlement demand within policy limits. If the insurer refuses and a larger verdict results, the insurer may be liable for the entire excess judgment above policy limits.

Texas proportionate responsibility under CPRC Chapter 33 applies the same rule regardless of vehicle type: at 50% or less fault you recover, reduced by your percentage; at 51% or more you recover nothing. The statute does not treat motorcyclists differently.

In practice, motorcycle riders face documented perceptual bias from adjusters and jurors. The “they take risks” assumption affects how fault percentages are estimated in pre-litigation negotiations and how jurors evaluate credibility at trial. This bias is not an insurmountable barrier, but it is a real factor that needs to be addressed actively, not assumed away.

Evidence that counters it: dashcam footage from the at-fault vehicle establishing the driver’s behavior before impact; eyewitness accounts that place the driver’s action as the initiating cause; accident reconstruction establishing sight lines and vehicle speeds; and police report fault notations, which carry significant weight with adjusters.

The Stowers doctrine creates leverage in these cases. If the at-fault driver’s insurer has a reasonable settlement demand within policy limits in front of it and refuses, and a larger verdict results, the insurer can be liable for the entire judgment, not just the policy limit. This changes the negotiation dynamic when the insurer is being unreasonable.

Under CPRC Section 33.004, defendants can designate responsible third parties to split the fault allocation. A road authority, a vehicle manufacturer, or another driver might be designated to reduce the defendant’s share. You have 60 days after the designation to add them as a defendant. Missing that window closes an avenue of recovery. Your attorney needs to track it.

Representative Results

← →

$409 Million Wrongful Death

A tragic case where an impaired driver of a commercial vehicle ran a red light, then collided with our client, causing serious bodily injury to the mother and the loss of life of her daughter.

$49 Million Motor Vehicle Accident

An impaired driver of a stolen vehicle driving the wrong way collided with our client head-on, resulting in brain injury and multiple broken bones.

$32,195,000 Industrial / Workplace

Failure to maintain proper safety protocols led to an explosion at an industrial plant causing a series of catastrophic injuries from broken bones, burns, spinal injury, and mental anguish.

$31.5 Million Industrial / Workplace

Brain and spinal injuries followed an oil-field company failing to maintain equipment and provide a safe work site.

$17.25 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident

Client was struck head-on by a disconnected load of an 18-wheeler that crossed the median causing broken bones and amputation.

$13 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident

On the interstate, an 18-wheeler failed to yield right of way then made an unsafe lane change causing the accident which resulted in major bone breaks, damaged organs, and ultimately a leg amputation.

$12.1 Million Motor Vehicle Accident

A commercial vehicle failed to stop at a red light subsequently crashing into our client causing serious brain injury and permanent loss of function.

$7 Million Motor Vehicle Accident

When the other vehicle struck our client, the result was a major hemorrhage and a stroke.

$7 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident

An 18-wheeler cut across traffic on an illegal left turn and hit our client, who suffered neck and back injuries.

$6.25 Million Motor Vehicle Accident

A fatigued commercial-vehicle driver fell asleep at the wheel and rear-ended our client, leaving our client with severe neck and back injuries.

$4.95 Million Wrongful Death

A hydraulic line exploded at a job site, taking the life of our client's loved one.

$4 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident

Our client's vehicle was struck by the at-fault vehicle, resulting in neck and back injuries.

$3.3 Million Motor Vehicle Accident

Motor vehicle collision. Details not publicly disclosed.

$3.25 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident

Commercial vehicle collision. Details not publicly disclosed.

$3.2 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident

While our client was stopped, the at-fault driver rear-ended our client's vehicle and set it on fire, leaving our client seriously hurt.

$3.15 Million Wrongful Death

An 18-wheeler caused a fatal collision that took the life of our client's loved one.

$3 Million Commercial Vehicle Accident

A commercial vehicle struck and killed our client's loved one, who was on foot.

$3 Million Motor Vehicle Accident

Out on the highway, the at-fault driver hit our client.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes; each case is decided on its own facts. See our full case results.

Texas Auto Insurance Minimums and Coverage Gaps for Motorcyclists

Texas requires minimum liability coverage of 30/60/25 under Tex. Transp. Code 601.072: $30,000 per person, $60,000 per accident, $25,000 property damage. Serious motorcycle injuries exceed that $30,000 per-person limit quickly. A single surgery for a femur fracture, a week in the ICU at Christus Good Shepherd Medical Center, or a skin graft procedure for road rash can each independently approach or exceed that limit.

UM/UIM

Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist coverage. Pays you when the at-fault driver has no insurance (UM) or insufficient insurance (UIM) to cover your damages. Texas law requires insurers to offer it with every auto policy.

When the at-fault driver carries only the minimum, your own UM/UIM coverage becomes the primary recovery source. Under Tex. Ins. Code Chapter 1952, insurers must offer UM/UIM with every auto policy. The insured can reject it in writing. If not rejected, it defaults to the liability limits. Many people do not realize they have it or what it covers.

Motorcycle policies can carry separate UM/UIM endorsements. The coverage structure for a motorcycle policy is not identical to a standard personal auto policy. Verify your own coverage with an attorney before assuming what you have. Hit-and-run scenarios on I-20 are a real exposure. If the at-fault driver flees and is never identified, your UM coverage is the only source of recovery for your injuries.

See the Longview injury lawyers hub for the full practice area overview.

Your Longview Injury Attorneys

Founder Trey Morris leads every injury case the firm takes.

• 

  Trey Morris

  Owner

What Motorcycle Injuries Mean for Your Claim

MMI

Maximum Medical Improvement. The point at which your treating physician determines your condition has stabilized and further treatment will not significantly improve the outcome. The timing of MMI affects when your damages can be fully calculated.

Motorcycle crashes produce a predictable injury spectrum, and each category carries a distinct damages profile that shapes claim value differently.

TBI

Traumatic Brain Injury. Physical damage to the brain caused by external force. Can range from concussion to severe diffuse axonal injury. Long-term cognitive and behavioral effects are common and may not be fully apparent for months after injury.

Traumatic brain injury occurs even with a properly worn helmet at sufficient impact speeds. TBI severity determines the long-term care cost projections and loss of earning capacity calculations. A mild TBI with full recovery has a different valuation than a moderate TBI with permanent cognitive deficits. Both require specific expert testimony to establish damages correctly.

Spinal fractures and cord injuries represent the most catastrophic end of the spectrum. Partial or full paralysis requires a life care plan projecting lifetime medical costs, equipment needs, and attendant care. These projections require a certified life care planner and an economist to convert future costs to present value. The damages in these cases are substantial, and the insurer’s response is often to dispute the extent of the injury or the reasonableness of the projected care.

Road rash sounds minor and is often treated that way by adjusters. Full-thickness abrasion stripping multiple skin layers requires skin graft surgery, carries infection risk, and produces significant non-economic damages including scarring. The real economic cost of road rash treatment is routinely underestimated by insurers.

Fractures of the lower extremities (tibia, fibula, femur) involve hardware implantation, inpatient rehabilitation, and long-term orthopedic follow-up. Internal organ injuries from handlebar or pavement impact require immediate surgical evaluation. Both categories can have lasting consequences that extend well beyond the initial hospitalization.

The injury documentation timeline matters as much as the injuries themselves. Initial ER records at Christus Good Shepherd Medical Center, follow-up specialist records, and the MMI determination together define the evidentiary record for your claim. Gaps in treatment create openings for the insurer to argue that injuries either did not occur or were pre-existing. Consistent treatment documentation closes those gaps.

For catastrophic injuries, see our catastrophic injury claims page.

What clients say

• ★★★★★

  Where should I start!?

  Trey Morris Injury Law Firm was a great fit for me! During this wild time of getting into a car wreck, dealing with insurance, and other third parties, Mrs. Brooke and Mrs. Nerren were extremely helpful! They were there for me through the whole process and never once did I doubt their professionalism. They will fight tooth and nail for you and get you what you deserve. I would recommend them to anyone.

  DDakota R.Ruston Office · Oct. 22, 2026
• ★★★★★

  Trey Morris what a great experience if I ever have to suggest a lawyer's office Morris is my first choice will be suggesting to friends and family

  AAdam W.Shreveport Office · Oct. 16, 2026
• ★★★★★

  Very professional and very easy to work with throughout the whole case!

  Lane and Men helped make the whole process go smonthly with no stress

  VVictoria M.Lake Charles Office · Oct. 8, 2026
• ★★★★★

  Great experience overall.

  Seth and Jessica were always there to help and I could tell they truly had my best interest in mind. I was overwhelmed after my incident and they walked me through every step of the way and provided a lot of relief.

  JJoel B.Covington Office · Sep. 14, 2026
• ★★★★★

  I hired [Trey Morris Injury Lawyers] to represent me with my case.

  Mr. Lane Robinson, Jessica, and Yadira has been with me every step of the way, making sure I received the proper care I needed to get well. They always called emailed and text to make sure I was doing OK. I would recommend the firm to anyone. They have an amazing team. I couldn’t have made a better choice. Thank you all for everything you have done for me and my family.

  KKaterrica C.Minden Office · Aug. 12, 2026
• ★★★★★

  I just want to express how pleased I am with [Trey Morris Injury Lawyers].

  Their caring team made a huge difference in my experience. From the moment I reached out, they were attentive and supportive, guiding me through every step of the process. They truly took the time to listen to my concerns and made me feel valued as a client. I highly recommend their services to anyone in need of a compassionate and dedicated legal team!

  MMaram Z.Ruston Office · Apr. 28, 2025

Testimonials do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Evidence That Determines Motorcycle Accident Case Outcomes

The police crash report from the Longview Police Department or Gregg County Sheriff’s Office is the foundational document in every motorcycle accident case. It records the investigating officer’s observations, the parties involved, and often an initial fault notation. Errors in the narrative can be contested, but they must be contested before they harden into the insurer’s accepted version of events.

Dashcam footage from the at-fault vehicle or nearby businesses is time-sensitive. Most dashcam systems and commercial security cameras overwrite footage within 24 to 72 hours without a preservation demand. A preservation letter must go to the relevant parties within days of the crash. Waiting until representation is formal can mean the best evidence is already gone.

Cell phone records matter when distracted driving is a factor. Left-turn failures against motorcyclists frequently involve a driver who was looking at a phone in the seconds before the turn. Subpoenaing those records is a standard litigation step, but the subpoena has to be served before the carrier purges records on its retention schedule.

Accident reconstruction

A forensic engineering analysis of a crash that uses physical evidence, vehicle damage, road marks, and physics calculations to establish vehicle speeds, positions, and the sequence of events leading to impact.

Accident reconstruction is often necessary in motorcycle cases. Motorcycle crash mechanics are different from car-to-car crashes. A reconstructionist can establish sight lines from the at-fault driver’s position, calculate the motorcycle’s speed from physical evidence, and establish the point of impact. This evidence counters speculative fault arguments.

EDR

Event Data Recorder. The vehicle’s onboard module that captures pre-crash speed, braking, and acceleration data during the seconds before impact. Data can be overwritten in subsequent crashes. A preservation demand prevents it.

Black box data from the at-fault vehicle records pre-impact speed, braking, and throttle position. In newer vehicles, event data recorders EDR capture the last several seconds of vehicle operation. That data must be preserved before the vehicle is repaired or the EDR is overwritten. A preservation demand to the at-fault driver’s insurer is standard procedure.

Trey Morris Injury Lawyers works with accident reconstructionists, biomechanical experts, and life care planners on motorcycle cases.

For wrongful death motorcycle crashes, see our wrongful death page.