Marshall construction work runs along the US-59 and US-80 corridors through Harrison County, where roadway crews work alongside live traffic, and on the scaffolds and trenches of commercial jobs inside the city. An injured worker goes first to CHRISTUS Good Shepherd Medical Center on South Washington Avenue, the city’s Level IV trauma center. The Marshall Police Department writes the report inside city limits, the Harrison County Sheriff’s Office writes it in the county, and OSHA opens its own file on a serious injury or a death. The civil suit is filed with the Harrison County District Clerk and heard in the 71st District Court at 200 West Houston Street. Trey Morris Injury Lawyers sends preservation letters to the general contractor, the owner, and every subcontractor for the job site logs, the safety meeting minutes, and the equipment involved, and checks the Texas Department of Insurance record to learn whether your employer carries workers’ compensation. We send those letters once the facts give us an honest basis for them, and moving promptly within what the law permits helps keep the records intact. The logs and minutes show who controlled the work and which hazards the crews had already discussed, and the equipment in its post-accident condition shows what failed.
The law that governs the claim is Texas law and it does not change from county to county. A construction-site injury is a two-year civil filing under CPRC Section 16.003(a). A property owner’s exposure to a contractor’s employee is limited by CPRC Section 95.003 unless the owner controlled the work and had actual knowledge of the specific danger. Trey Morris Injury Lawyers sorts that owner defense from a non-subscriber employer claim under Tex. Labor Code Section 406.002.
OSHA Fatal Four: The Accidents That Kill Most Construction Workers
OSHA Fatal Four
Four hazard categories identified by OSHA that account for more than 60% of construction fatalities nationwide: falls, struck-by objects, electrocution, and caught-in/between incidents. Each category has specific OSHA standards requiring protective measures.
Four types of construction incidents account for more than 60% of construction worker fatalities in the United States. Understanding them matters because OSHA violations in these categories are direct evidence of negligence in your claim.
Falls from heights remain the leading killer. Scaffolding failures, missing guardrails, improperly secured ladders, and unguarded floor openings all fall under this category. OSHA standards under 29 CFR Part 1926 require specific fall protection at heights of six feet or more on construction sites. When those protections are missing, the employer’s failure to comply becomes the foundation of the case.
Struck-by accidents account for roughly 15% of fatal construction incidents. These include workers struck by swinging crane loads, vehicles operating in or near work zones, and tools or materials falling from upper levels. East Texas infrastructure work along US-59 and US-80 corridors in Harrison County places workers directly alongside vehicle traffic. Active roadway construction creates elevated struck-by exposure that requires specific traffic control plans under OSHA standards.
Electrocution occurs when workers contact overhead power lines, unguarded electrical sources, or improperly grounded equipment. Only certified electricians should connect or modify electrical systems on site. When unqualified workers are assigned electrical tasks, the supervising contractor’s exposure is significant. Caught-in/between incidents involve trench collapses, machine entanglement, and pinch points between equipment. OSHA requires protective systems for all trenches five feet or deeper. An unbraced trench collapse is almost always a preventable event.
For accidents involving commercial vehicles in work zones, see big truck accidents for the distinct federal carrier liability analysis.
Who Is Legally Responsible on a Texas Construction Site?
Construction site liability is not limited to your direct employer. Multiple parties can carry legal responsibility simultaneously, and identifying all of them affects how much you can recover.
The general contractor bears primary responsibility for overall site safety under OSHA 29 CFR 1926 standards. This duty cannot be delegated away entirely. A general contractor who tells a subcontractor to handle safety and then never verifies compliance still carries exposure when an employee of that subcontractor is injured. General contractors control the site. That control creates ongoing obligations.
Each subcontractor is independently responsible for the safety of its own employees and the conditions it creates. A roofing subcontractor who creates an unguarded edge is responsible for falls from that edge, regardless of what the general contractor required in the contract. Equipment manufacturers are separately exposed when defective scaffolding, power tools, cranes, or fall-arrest harnesses fail. This is a product liability claim that runs alongside the employer negligence claim, not instead of it.
Staffing agencies introduce additional complexity. When a temp worker is injured, both the agency and the host employer may carry joint responsibility depending on who directed the work and who controlled the site conditions. Property owner liability follows a different rule discussed in the next section.
The number of defendants matters to the total recovery. See workers’ compensation and wrongful death for specific claim type information.
The Texas Non-Subscriber Advantage in Construction Cases
Texas is the only state in the country that allows private employers to opt out of workers’ compensation. Understanding whether your employer carries coverage determines everything about your legal strategy.
non-subscriber
A Texas employer who has opted out of the state workers’ compensation system under Tex. Labor Code Section 406.002. Non-subscriber employers lose three tort defenses and can be sued directly for negligence by injured employees.
Under Tex. Labor Code Section 406.002, private employers in Texas can choose not to participate in the workers’ comp system. Employers who opt out are called non-subscribers. When a non-subscriber employer’s worker is injured, that worker can sue in civil court for negligence rather than pursuing a workers’ comp administrative claim.
Non-subscriber status eliminates three defenses the employer would otherwise have:
Contributory negligence is the first. A subscriber employer can argue that your own partial fault reduces your recovery. A non-subscriber employer cannot make that argument. Even if you made a mistake on the job, the employer cannot use it to reduce what you’re owed.
Assumption of risk is the second. An employer cannot argue you knew the danger and accepted it by continuing to work. Construction workers know the job carries risk. That general knowledge does not eliminate the employer’s obligation to maintain safe conditions.
The fellow servant doctrine is the third. An employer cannot shift blame to a coworker’s negligence. If a coworker caused your injury, the non-subscriber employer still bears full responsibility for the environment in which that coworker was operating.
To check your employer’s status, search the Texas Department of Insurance workers’ comp coverage verification at tdi.texas.gov. Subscriber or non-subscriber status determines which claims you file, what defenses the employer has, and what damages you can pursue. See workers’ compensation for how the two claim types interact when both apply.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes; each case is decided on its own facts. See our full case results.
CPRC Section 95.003 and the Independent Contractor Exception
Property owners in Texas have a statutory limit on their liability to independent contractor employees. That limit contains an exception, and that exception is where most successful property owner claims are built.
CPRC 95.003
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 95.003. Limits property owner liability for injuries to independent contractor employees when the injury arises from the contractor’s work, unless the owner exercised control over the work and had actual knowledge of the specific danger.
Under CPRC Section 95.003, a property owner generally cannot be held liable for an injury to an independent contractor’s employee when that injury arises from the work the contractor was hired to do. The legislature created this protection to limit owner exposure on job sites where the contractor controls the means and methods of work.
The exception is two-part. The owner must have exercised or retained some control over the manner in which the work was performed AND had actual knowledge of the specific danger that caused the injury. Both elements must be present. Constructive knowledge is not enough under Section 95.003. Knowing generally that construction is dangerous does not satisfy the actual knowledge element.
“Control” is interpreted broadly by Texas courts. Daily site walk-throughs by the owner’s project manager qualify. Authority to stop unsafe work qualifies. Supplying equipment qualifies. Directing the sequence of construction phases qualifies. The control element is often documented in project communications that owners and their representatives do not think will be discoverable.
“Actual knowledge” requires more than general awareness that construction is dangerous. The owner must have known about the specific dangerous condition. An owner who received a prior OSHA citation for the same hazard, or whose project manager attended a safety meeting where the specific risk was discussed, may satisfy the actual knowledge element.
Job site logs, daily reports, safety meeting minutes, and email chains between the owner’s representatives and the general contractor are the primary evidence of control over the site. These must be preserved quickly. Construction projects move on after injuries, and documentation is routinely discarded.
Your Marshall Injury Attorneys
Founder Trey Morris leads every injury case the firm takes.
Exemplary Damages for Gross Negligence on Construction Sites
Texas allows exemplary damages in construction accident cases when the defendant’s conduct constitutes gross negligence under CPRC Chapter 41. Gross negligence is a distinct standard from ordinary negligence and requires different evidence to prove.
gross negligence
Under Texas law, an act or omission involving an extreme degree of risk where the defendant had actual subjective awareness of that risk and proceeded anyway. Required for exemplary damages under CPRC Chapter 41.
Under CPRC Chapter 41, gross negligence requires two elements: the conduct involved an extreme degree of risk, and the defendant had actual subjective awareness of the risk but proceeded anyway.
Gross negligence claims in construction have succeeded in cases like these: a supervisor approved removing fall protection in writing to speed up work. An employer ignored repeated OSHA citations for the same unguarded hazard. A foreman ordered workers into an unbraced trench after a prior cave-in warning on the same site. The pattern of documented knowledge combined with continued unsafe practice is the clearest path to gross negligence.
Exemplary damages in Texas are subject to a cap under CPRC Section 41.008. The cap is the greater of two times economic damages plus noneconomic damages up to $750,000, or $200,000. The cap does not apply to certain felony conduct such as aggravated assault. The clear and convincing evidence standard governs. This is a higher bar than the preponderance standard used for ordinary negligence.
OSHA inspection records, prior violation citations, internal safety audits, and supervisor communications are the key documents. These establish both the extreme risk and the defendant’s actual knowledge. When someone died on a site, the same evidence supports exemplary damages in a wrongful death claim.
What clients say
- ★★★★★
Trey Morris what a great experience if I ever have to suggest a lawyer's office Morris is my first choice will be suggesting to friends and family
- ★★★★★
Joe and Jaime were awesome with helping me from beginning to end.
Loved working with such a great team!
- ★★★★★
Very professional and very easy to work with throughout the whole case!
Lane and Men helped make the whole process go smonthly with no stress
- ★★★★★
Great experience overall.
Seth and Jessica were always there to help and I could tell they truly had my best interest in mind. I was overwhelmed after my incident and they walked me through every step of the way and provided a lot of relief.
- ★★★★★
I hired [Trey Morris Injury Lawyers] to represent me with my case.
Mr. Lane Robinson, Jessica, and Yadira has been with me every step of the way, making sure I received the proper care I needed to get well. They always called emailed and text to make sure I was doing OK. I would recommend the firm to anyone. They have an amazing team. I couldn’t have made a better choice. Thank you all for everything you have done for me and my family.
- ★★★★★
My husband was a client of Attorney Morris last year and we were very pleased.
The most intelligent and friendly staff that would just make you find reasons to call or stop by. Out of my many years of working with and hiring attorneys, I must say that Attorney Tre Morris and staff are just OUTSTANDING!!! If you're looking for a honest hard working attorney with a pleasant staff. Contact Attorney Morris and he's handsome too😉
Testimonials do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
How Long Do You Have to File a Construction Injury Claim in Texas?
Under CPRC Section 16.003(a), the statute of limitations for personal injury is two years from the date of injury. For wrongful death, two years runs from the date of death under CPRC Section 16.003(b). These deadlines apply to civil lawsuits, not to workers’ comp administrative filings, which have their own shorter notice requirements.
The discovery rule creates an exception for injuries that are latent or inherently undiscoverable through reasonable diligence. Occupational disease, cumulative trauma disorders, and delayed-onset hearing loss may not manifest until years after exposure. In those situations, limitations begins when the injured person discovers or should have discovered the injury through reasonable investigation. The discovery rule is applied narrowly. It is not a general extension of the deadline.
Minors have additional protection. The statute of limitations is tolled until a minor turns 18, then runs for two years. An injured 14-year-old has until age 20 to file. Disability arising after the limitations period begins does not pause it. The tolling rules apply only to conditions present at the time of injury.
Do not wait on a construction injury claim. Evidence deteriorates faster on construction sites than almost anywhere else. Equipment is removed, scaffolding is reconfigured, witnesses leave the project, and OSHA’s inspection windows for incident documentation close quickly. Harrison County civil injury cases are filed in the Harrison County District Court at 200 W Houston St, Marshall, TX 75670.
Workers’ comp notice deadlines are separate and can be significantly shorter. If your employer is a workers’ comp subscriber, talk to a lawyer immediately to understand the comp filing timeline alongside any civil claim.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a workers' comp claim and a third-party injury claim in Texas?
Can I sue my employer directly if they did not carry workers' compensation?
What does the OSHA Fatal Four mean for my construction accident case?
How does CPRC Section 95.003 affect my ability to sue the property owner?
What evidence should I preserve after a construction accident in Marshall TX?
How long do I have to file a construction accident lawsuit in Texas?
What are exemplary damages and can I recover them in a construction case?
Last updated October 7, 2026